John Edwards
- Democratic
Sentencing guidelines; written explanation; appeal. Requires that the written explanation the court files with the record of a case when departing from the sentencing guidelines adequately explains the sentence imposed to promote fair sentencing. The bill also provides that the failure to follow any of the required sentencing provisions, including the failure to provide a written explanation that adequately explains the sentence imposed, shall be reviewable on appeal or may the basis of any other post-conviction relief. The bill also provides that the failure to provide a written explanation that adequately explains the sentence imposed is error that may constitute a basis for resentencing by the trial judge. Under current law, the failure to follow any or all of the provisions of the sentencing guidelines or the failure to follow any or all of such provisions in the prescribed manner is not reviewable on appeal and cannot be the basis of any other post-conviction relief. The provisions of the bill apply only to those sentencing hearings conducted and such sentences imposed on or after July 1, 2022.
Sentencing guidelines; written explanation;appeal. Requires that the written explanation the court fileswith the record of a case when departing from the sentencing guidelinesadequately explains the sentence imposed to promote fair sentencing.The bill also provides that the failure to follow any of the requiredsentencing provisions, including the failure to provide a writtenexplanation that adequately explains the sentence imposed, may bereviewable on appeal or the basis of any other post-conviction relief.Under current law, the failure to follow any or all of the provisionsof the sentencing guidelines or the failure to follow any or allof such provisions in the prescribed manner is not reviewable onappeal and cannot be the basis of any other post-conviction relief.The provisions of the bill apply only to those sentencing hearingsconducted and such sentences imposed on or after July 1, 2022.
Left in Courts of Justice
Subcommittee recommends passing by indefinitely (5-Y 3-N)
Assigned Courts sub: Subcommittee #1
Placed on Calendar
Referred to Committee for Courts of Justice
Read first time
Impact statement from DPB (SB137ES1)
Amendments by Senator Edwards agreed to (24-Y 16-N)
Passed Senate (23-Y 17-N)
Constitutional reading dispensed (40-Y 0-N)
Printed as engrossed 22106160D-ES1
Engrossed by Senate - committee substitute with amendments SB137ES1
Reading of amendments waived
Engrossment reconsidered by Senate (40-Y 0-N)
Impact statement from DPB (SB137S1)
Passed by for the day
Read third time and defeated by Senate (20-Y 20-N)
Chair votes No
Reconsideration of defeated action agreed to by Senate (40-Y 0-N)
Engrossed by Senate - committee substitute SB137S1
Committee substitute agreed to 22106160D-S1
Reading of substitute waived
Read second time
Constitutional reading dispensed (40-Y 0-N)
Reported from Judiciary with substitute (9-Y 4-N)
Committee substitute printed 22106160D-S1
Senate committee, floor amendments and substitutes offered
Senate subcommittee amendments and substitutes offered
Assigned Judiciary sub: Criminal Law
Referred to Committee on the Judiciary
Prefiled and ordered printed; offered 01/12/22 22100360D
Bill Text Versions | Format |
---|---|
Prefiled and ordered printed; offered 01/12/22 22100360D | PDF HTML |
Committee substitute printed 22106160D-S1 | PDF HTML |
Printed as engrossed 22106160D-ES1 | PDF HTML |
Document | Format |
---|---|
Fiscal Impact Statement: SB137FES1122.PDF | |
Fiscal Impact Statement: SB137FS1122.PDF | |
Amendment: SB137AS | HTML |
Data on Open States is updated periodically throughout the day from the official website of the Virginia General Assembly.
If you notice any inconsistencies with these official sources, feel free to file an issue.