Tim Neville
- Republican
The bill seeks to clarify the general assembly's intent when it enacted a dispute resolution process in 1985 to address a situation when a taxpayer paid a sales and use tax to one local government when it should have instead paid that disputed amount to a different local government. A recent court case applied the statute of limitations to this dispute resolution process, resulting in the taxpayer having to pay the disputed amount twice to 2 different local governments. The bill specifies that any statutes of limitations, either local, state, or in intergovernmental transfer agreements, do not apply to the remedies set forth in law. (Note: This summary applies to the reengrossed version of this bill as introduced in the second house.)
Governor Signed
Sent to the Governor
Signed by the Speaker of the House
Signed by the President of the Senate
Senate Considered House Amendments - Result was to Concur - Repass
House Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
House Second Reading Passed with Amendments - Committee, Floor
House Committee on Local Government Refer Amended to House Committee of the Whole
Introduced In House - Assigned to Local Government
Senate Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
Senate Second Reading Special Order - Passed with Amendments - Committee
Senate Committee on Finance Refer Amended - Consent Calendar to Senate Committee of the Whole
Bill Text Versions | Format |
---|---|
Amendment L.001 | |
Committee Amendment | |
PA1 (02/10/2017) | |
PA2 (03/23/2017) | |
Introduced (01/27/2017) | |
Engrossed (02/13/2017) | |
Reengrossed (02/14/2017) | |
Revised (03/28/2017) | |
Rerevised (03/29/2017) | |
Final Act (04/13/2017) | |
Signed Act (04/18/2017) |
Document | Format |
---|---|
Fiscal Note FN1 (02/07/2017) | |
Fiscal Note FN2 (05/16/2017) |
Data on Open States is updated periodically throughout the day from the official website of the Colorado General Assembly.
If you notice any inconsistencies with these official sources, feel free to file an issue.