John Laird
- Democratic
- Senator
- District 17
Existing law, the Bagley-Keene Open Meeting Act, requires, with specified exceptions, that all meetings of a state body be open and public and all persons be permitted to attend any meeting of a state body. The act authorizes meetings through teleconference subject to specified requirements, including, among others, that the state body post agendas at all teleconference locations, that each teleconference location be identified in the notice and agenda of the meeting or proceeding, that each teleconference location be accessible to the public, that the agenda provide an opportunity for members of the public to address the state body directly at each teleconference location, and that at least one member of the state body be physically present at the location specified in the notice of the meeting. This bill would enact an additional, alternative set of provisions under which a state body may hold a meeting by teleconference. The bill would require at least one member of the state body to be physically present at each teleconference location, defined for these purposes as a physical location that is accessible to the public and from which members of the public may participate in the meeting. The bill would, under specified circumstances, authorize a member of the state body to participate from a remote location, which would not be required to be accessible to the public and which the bill would prohibit the notice and agenda from disclosing. Specifically, the bill would authorize a member's remote participation if the other members who are physically present at the same teleconference location constitute a majority of the state body. The bill would also authorize a member's remote participation if the member has a need related to a disability and notifies the state body, as specified. Under the bill, that member would be counted toward the majority of members required to be physically present at the same teleconference location. The bill would require a member who participates from a remote location to disclose whether any other individuals 18 years of age or older are present in the room at the remote location with the member and the general nature of the member's relationship with those individuals. This bill would require the members of the state body to visibly appear on camera during the open portion of a meeting that is publicly accessible via the internet or other online platform unless the appearance would be technologically impracticable, as specified. The bill would require a member who does not appear on camera due to challenges with internet connectivity to announce the reason for their nonappearance when they turn off their camera. This bill would also require the state body to provide a means by which the public may remotely hear audio of the meeting, remotely observe the meeting, remotely address the body, or attend the meeting by providing on the posted agenda a teleconference telephone number, an internet website or other online platform, and a physical address for each teleconference location. The bill would require the telephonic or online means provided to the public to access the meeting to be equivalent to the telephonic or online means provided to a member of the state body participating remotely. The bill would require any notice required by the act to specify the applicable teleconference telephone number, internet website or other online platform, and physical address of each teleconference location, as well as any other information indicating how the public can access the meeting remotely and in person. If the state body allows members of the public to observe and address the meeting telephonically or otherwise electronically, the bill would require the state body to implement and advertise, as prescribed, a procedure for receiving and swiftly resolving requests for reasonable modification or accommodation from individuals with disabilities, as specified. The bill would impose requirements consistent with the above-described existing law provisions, including a requirement that the agenda provide an opportunity for members of the public to address the state body directly, as specified. The bill would entitle members of the public to exercise their right to directly address the state body during the teleconferenced meeting without being required to submit public comments before the meeting or in writing. This bill would provide that it does not affect prescribed existing notice and agenda requirements and would require the state body to post an agenda on its internet website and, on the day of the meeting, at each teleconference location designated in the notice of the meeting. This bill would require the state body, upon discovering that a means of remote participation required by the bill has failed during the meeting and cannot be restored, to end or adjourn the meeting in accordance with prescribed adjournment and notice provisions, including information about reconvening. Existing law authorizes a multimember state advisory body to hold an open meeting by teleconference pursuant to an alternative set of provisions that are in addition to the above-described provisions generally applicable to state bodies. Under those alternative provisions, a quorum of the members of the state advisory body must be in attendance at the primary physical meeting location, as specified, and all decisions taken during the meeting must be by rollcall vote. This bill would remove the rollcall vote requirement and the requirement for a quorum in attendance at the primary physical meeting location. The bill, instead, would require at least one staff member of the state body to be present at the primary physical meeting location. The bill would require the members of the state body to visibly appear on camera during the open portion of a meeting that is publicly accessible via the internet or other online platform unless the appearance would be technologically impracticable, as specified. The bill would require a member who does not appear on camera due to challenges with internet connectivity to announce the reason for their nonappearance when they turn off their camera. This bill would repeal the above-described provisions on January 1, 2026. Existing law prohibits requiring a person, as a condition of attendance at a meeting of a state body, to register their name, to provide other information, to complete a questionnaire, or otherwise to fulfill any condition precedent to their attendance. Existing law requires an attendance list, register, questionnaire, or other similar document posted at or near the entrance to the room where the meeting is to be held, or circulated to persons present during the meeting, to state clearly that the signing, registering, or completion of the document is voluntary, and that all persons may attend the meeting regardless of whether a person signs, registers, or completes the document. This bill would exempt from those provisions an internet website or other online platform that may require the submission of information to log into a teleconferenced meeting. The bill would permit a person to submit a pseudonym or other anonymous information when using the internet website or other online platform to attend the meeting. Existing constitutional provisions require that a statute that limits the right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest. This bill would make legislative findings to that effect.
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 216, Statutes of 2023.
Approved by the Governor.
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3 p.m.
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 30. Noes 5. Page 2793.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 50. Noes 15. Page 3354.) Ordered to the Senate.
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
Ordered to third reading.
Read third time and amended.
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 3.) (September 1).
August 23 hearing postponed by committee.
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 12. Noes 2.) (July 12).
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 26. Noes 3. Page 1079.) Ordered to the Assembly.
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
Set for hearing May 8.
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0. Page 894.) (April 25).
Set for hearing April 25.
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 13. Noes 1. Page 656.) (April 11). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
Set for hearing April 11.
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 18.
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
| Bill Text Versions | Format |
|---|---|
| SB544 | HTML |
| 02/15/23 - Introduced | |
| 03/20/23 - Amended Senate | |
| 04/27/23 - Amended Senate | |
| 08/14/23 - Amended Assembly | |
| 09/08/23 - Amended Assembly | |
| 09/18/23 - Enrolled | |
| 09/22/23 - Chaptered |
| Document | Format |
|---|---|
| 04/07/23- Senate Governmental Organization | |
| 04/23/23- Senate Judiciary | |
| 05/10/23- Sen. Floor Analyses | |
| 07/11/23- Assembly Governmental Organization | |
| 08/30/23- Assembly Appropriations | |
| 09/05/23- ASSEMBLY FLOOR ANALYSIS | |
| 09/08/23- ASSEMBLY FLOOR ANALYSIS | |
| 09/14/23- Sen. Floor Analyses |
Data on Open States is updated periodically throughout the day from the official website of the California State Legislature.
If you notice any inconsistencies with these official sources, feel free to file an issue.