Lola Smallwood-Cuevas
- Democratic
- Senator
- District 28
Author
(1) Existing law prohibits a person from discharging an employee or in any manner discriminating, retaliating, or taking any adverse action against any employee or applicant for employment because the employee or applicant engaged in protected conduct, as specified. Under existing law, an employee who is discharged, threatened with discharge, demoted, suspended, retaliated against, subjected to adverse action, or in any other manner discriminated against in the terms and conditions of their employment because, among other things, the employee engaged in protected conduct, as specified, the employee shall be entitled to reinstatement and reimbursement for lost wages and work benefits caused by those acts of the employer. This bill would create a rebuttable presumption in favor of the employee's claim if an employer engages in any action prohibited by this provision within 90 days of the protected activity specified in this provision. (2) Existing law prohibits employers and their agents from making, adopting, or enforcing a rule, regulation, or policy preventing an employee from disclosing information to certain entities or from providing information to, or testifying before, any public body conducting an investigation, hearing, or inquiry if the employee has reasonable cause to believe that the information discloses a violation of a law, as specified. Existing law also prohibits retaliation against an employee for various reasons. Under existing law, in addition to other penalties, an employer that is a corporation or limited liability company is liable for a civil penalty not exceeding $10,000 for each violation of this provision. This bill would instead establish that in addition to other remedies, an employer is liable for a civil penalty not exceeding $10,000 per employee for each violation of this provision, to be awarded to the employee who was retaliated against. The bill would require the Labor Commissioner, in assessing this penalty, to consider the nature and seriousness of the violation based on the evidence obtained during the course of the investigation, as prescribed. (3) Existing law prohibits an employer from paying an employee at wage rates less than the rates paid to an employee of the opposite sex for substantially similar work, when viewed as a composite of skill, effort, and responsibility, and performed under similar working conditions, except upon a specified demonstration by the employer. Existing law prohibits an employer from prohibiting an employee from disclosing the employee's own wages, discussing the wages of others, inquiring about another employee's wages, or aiding or encouraging any other employee to exercise these and other rights. Existing law prohibits an employer from discharging or discriminating or retaliating against an employee because of an action taken by the employee to invoke these and other provisions. Existing law requires a civil action brought in this regard to be commenced within no later than one year, as specified. This bill would create a rebuttable presumption in favor of the employee's claim if an employer engages in any action prohibited by this provision within 90 days of the protected activity specified in this provision.
Approved by the Governor.
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 612, Statutes of 2023.
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4 p.m.
In Senate. Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 52. Noes 17. Page 3050.) Ordered to the Senate.
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 10. Noes 4.) (August 23).
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (July 12). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on L. & E. (Ayes 7. Noes 2.) (June 20). Re-referred to Com. on L. & E.
Re-referred to Coms. on JUD. and L. & E. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 29. Noes 10. Page 1346.) Ordered to the Assembly.
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 1172.) (May 18).
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
Set for hearing May 18.
May 8 hearing: Placed on APPR suspense file.
Set for hearing May 8.
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 2. Page 893.) (April 25).
Set for hearing April 25.
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 4. Noes 1. Page 712.) (April 12). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
Set for hearing April 12.
Referred to Coms. on L., P.E. & R., JUD., and APPR.
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 17.
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
| Bill Text Versions | Format |
|---|---|
| SB497 | HTML |
| 02/14/23 - Introduced | |
| 04/27/23 - Amended Senate | |
| 09/11/23 - Enrolled | |
| 10/08/23 - Chaptered |
| Document | Format |
|---|---|
| 04/11/23- Senate Committee on Labor, Public Employment and Retirement | |
| 04/21/23- Senate Judiciary | |
| 05/05/23- Senate Appropriations | |
| 05/20/23- Sen. Floor Analyses | |
| 06/16/23- Assembly Judiciary | |
| 07/10/23- Assembly Labor and Employment | |
| 08/21/23- Assembly Appropriations | |
| 08/25/23- ASSEMBLY FLOOR ANALYSIS |
Data on Open States is updated periodically throughout the day from the official website of the California State Legislature.
If you notice any inconsistencies with these official sources, feel free to file an issue.