AB 2759

  • California Assembly Bill
  • 2023-2024 Regular Session
  • Introduced in Assembly
  • Passed Assembly Apr 18, 2024
  • Passed Senate Jun 27, 2024
  • Became Law Sep 24, 2024

Domestic violence protective orders: possession of a firearm.

Abstract

Existing law prohibits a person subject to a protective order, as defined, from owning, possessing, purchasing, or receiving a firearm or ammunition while that protective order is in effect and makes a willful and knowing violation of a protective order a crime. Existing law requires the court, when issuing the order with both parties present, to inform the parties of this information and to order the restrained person to relinquish any firearm or ammunition in the person's immediate possession or control or subject to their immediate possession or control. Existing law specifies the means of relinquishment if the law enforcement officer serving the protective order does not request the immediate surrender of the firearm or ammunition, including, surrender to law enforcement, or by selling the firearm or ammunition to a licensed gun dealer. Existing law requires a court to order the restrained person to relinquish firearms or ammunition and to notify the parties of how any firearms or ammunition still in the restrained party's possession are to be relinquished and how to submit a receipt to the court. Existing law authorizes the court to grant an exemption from the relinquishment order for a particular firearm or ammunition if the respondent can show that the firearm or ammunition is a necessary condition of continued employment and the person cannot be reassigned, as specified, and only authorizes possession on the job or traveling to and from employment. If the person is a peace officer who carries a firearm or ammunition as a condition of employment and the peace officer's personal safety depends on the ability to carry a firearm or ammunition, the court may exempt them from the relinquishment order, on duty or off, if the court finds that the peace officer does not pose a threat of harm. Existing law requires, prior to making this finding, that the court require a mandatory psychological evaluation of the peace officer and authorizes the court to require the peace officer to enter into counseling or other remedial treatment program to deal with any propensity for domestic violence. This bill would revise the peace officer exemption to authorize a court to allow a peace officer to carry a specific firearm, ammunition, or firearm and ammunition if the peace officer is required, as a condition of continued employment, to carry that firearm, ammunition, or firearm and ammunition, as specified, if they cannot be reassigned, and if the court finds by a preponderance of the evidence, in writing or on the record, that the peace officer's personal safety depends on the ability to carry that specific firearm, ammunition, or firearm and ammunition outside of scheduled work hours and they do not pose an additional threat of harm to a protected party or the public, as specified. The bill would require the mandatory psychological evaluation of the peace officer to be conducted by a mental health professional with domestic violence expertise and would require the court to consider the results of that evaluation. This bill would authorize an exemption from the relinquishment requirement, only during scheduled working hours, for a nonpeace officer who is required to carry a specific firearm, ammunition, or firearm and ammunition as a condition of continued employment, as specified, if the court finds by a preponderance of the evidence, in writing or on the record, that the respondent does not pose an additional threat of harm to a protected party or the public by having access to the specific firearm, ammunition, or firearm and ammunition. The bill would authorize the court to order a psychological evaluation by a licensed mental health professional with domestic violence expertise to make this finding. The bill would require the court, if an exemption is granted during the pendency of a temporary restraining order and the court subsequently issues a restraining order on the same application, to review and make a finding regarding the appropriateness of the granted exemption, as provided. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 6389 of the Family Code proposed by SB 899 to be operative only if this bill and SB 899 are enacted and this bill is enacted last.

Bill Sponsors (1)

Votes


Actions


Sep 24, 2024

California State Legislature

Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 535, Statutes of 2024.

California State Legislature

Approved by the Governor.

Sep 11, 2024

California State Legislature

Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4 p.m.

Aug 29, 2024

Assembly

Assembly Rule 77 suspended.

Assembly

Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 76. Noes 0.).

Aug 28, 2024

Assembly

In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 30 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.

Senate

Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 38. Noes 0.).

Aug 26, 2024

Senate

Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

Aug 23, 2024

Senate

Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

Senate

Ordered to third reading.

Senate

Action rescinded whereby the bill was read third time, passed, and to Assembly.

Aug 08, 2024

Senate

In Senate. Held at Desk.

Assembly

Ordered to the Senate.

Jun 27, 2024

Assembly

In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after June 29 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.

Senate

Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 40. Noes 0.).

Jun 20, 2024

Senate

Read second time and amended. Ordered to consent calendar.

Jun 19, 2024

Senate

From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (June 18).

Jun 04, 2024

Senate

From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (June 4). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

  • Committee-Passage
  • Committee-Passage-Favorable
  • Referral-Committee
Com. on JUD.

May 01, 2024

Senate

Referred to Coms. on PUB S. and JUD.

  • Referral-Committee
Coms. on PUB S. and JUD.

Apr 18, 2024

Senate

In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

Assembly

Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 72. Noes 0.)

Apr 11, 2024

Assembly

Read second time. Ordered to Consent Calendar.

Apr 10, 2024

Assembly

Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.

Apr 09, 2024

Assembly

From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (April 9).

Apr 03, 2024

Assembly

From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (April 2). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

  • Committee-Passage
  • Committee-Passage-Favorable
  • Referral-Committee
Com. on JUD.

Mar 04, 2024

Assembly

Referred to Coms. on PUB. S. and JUD.

  • Referral-Committee
Coms. on PUB. S. and JUD.

Feb 16, 2024

Assembly

From printer. May be heard in committee March 17.

Feb 15, 2024

Assembly

Read first time. To print.

Bill Text

Bill Text Versions Format
AB2759 HTML
02/15/24 - Introduced PDF
04/10/24 - Amended Assembly PDF
06/20/24 - Amended Senate PDF
08/23/24 - Amended Senate PDF
09/03/24 - Enrolled PDF
09/24/24 - Chaptered PDF

Related Documents

Document Format
04/01/24- Assembly Public Safety PDF
04/05/24- Assembly Judiciary PDF
05/31/24- Senate Public Safety PDF
06/14/24- Senate Judiciary PDF
06/21/24- Sen. Floor Analyses PDF
06/28/24- ASSEMBLY FLOOR ANALYSIS PDF
08/25/24- Sen. Floor Analyses PDF
08/29/24- ASSEMBLY FLOOR ANALYSIS PDF

Sources

Data on Open States is updated periodically throughout the day from the official website of the California State Legislature.

If you notice any inconsistencies with these official sources, feel free to file an issue.