Susan Eggman
- Democratic
- Senator
- District 5
Author
Unless a city or county within the Sacramento-San Joaquin Valley makes certain findings after the effective date of specified amendments to its general plan, the Planning and Zoning Law prohibits a city or county from entering into a development agreement for property located in a flood hazard zone; approving a discretionary permit, ministerial permit, or other discretionary entitlement for a project that is located within a flood hazard zone, as specified; or approving a tentative map, or a parcel map for which a tentative map was not required, for a subdivision that is located within a flood hazard zone. Those findings include, among others, that the local flood management agency has made adequate progress on the construction of a flood protection system that will result in flood protection equal to or greater than the urban level of flood protection in urban or urbanizing areas. Existing law further requires urban and urbanizing areas protected by any levee that is part of the facilities of the State Plan of Flood Control to achieve the urban level of flood protection by 2025. This bill would instead require the Mossdale Tract, as defined, to achieve the urban level of flood protection by 2028. The bill would authorize the Department of Water Resources to require the San Joaquin Area Flood Control Agency to contribute its fair and reasonable share of any property damage caused by a flood, as specified. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the Mossdale Tract.
Approved by the Governor.
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 208, Statutes of 2020.
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4 p.m.
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 76. Noes 0. Page 5480.).
Ordered to the unfinished business file.
Action rescinded whereby the bill was re-referred to Com. on JUD. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
Re-referred to Com. on JUD. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 30. Noes 0. Page 4355.).
From Consent Calendar.
Ordered to third reading.
Read second time and amended. Ordered to consent calendar.
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (August 5).
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on RLS.
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 74. Noes 0. Page 3904.)
Assembly Rule 63 suspended. (Ayes 58. Noes 18. Page 3893.)
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (January 23).
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (April 10). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on AGRI. Read second time and amended.
From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
Read first time. To print.
| Bill Text Versions | Format |
|---|---|
| AB838 | HTML |
| 02/20/19 - Introduced | |
| 03/28/19 - Amended Assembly | |
| 01/23/20 - Amended Assembly | |
| 06/25/20 - Amended Senate | |
| 08/11/20 - Amended Senate | |
| 09/04/20 - Enrolled | |
| 09/28/20 - Chaptered |
| Document | Format |
|---|---|
| No related documents. |
Data on Open States is updated periodically throughout the day from the official website of the California State Legislature.
If you notice any inconsistencies with these official sources, feel free to file an issue.