SCA 5

  • California Senate Constitutional Amendment
  • 2015-2016 Regular Session
  • Introduced in Senate Mar 26, 2015
  • Senate
  • Assembly
  • Governor

A resolution to propose to the people of the State of California an amendment to the Constitution of the State, by adding Section 3.1 to Article XIII thereof, by adding Sections 2.5 and 8.8 to Article XIIIA thereof, by adding Section 14 to Article XIIIB thereof, and by adding Sections 8.6 and 8.7 to Article XVI thereof, relating to local government finance.

Abstract

The California Constitution provides that all property is taxable, unless exempted by the California Constitution or by federal law. The California Constitution authorizes the Legislature to classify personal property for differential taxation or for exemption by means of a statute approved by a 23 vote of the membership of each house. This measure would exempt from taxation for each taxpayer an amount up to $500,000 of tangible personal property used for business purposes. This measure would prohibit the Legislature from lowering this exemption amount or from changing its application, but would authorize it to be increased consistent with the authority described above. This measure would provide that this provision shall become operative on January 1, 2019. This measure, for owners of commercial and industrial property subject to reassessment under this measure who operate a business or businesses on that property, where the resulting increase in assessed value exceeds 25%, would exempt that portion of the increase in assessed value that exceeds 25% from taxation for a period of 5 years if specified conditions are met. The California Constitution generally limits ad valorem taxes on real property to 1% of the full cash value of that property. For purposes of this limitation, "full cash value" is defined as the assessor's valuation of real property as shown on the 1975–76 tax bill under "full cash value" or, thereafter, the appraised value of that real property when purchased, newly constructed, or a change in ownership has occurred. This measure, commencing on the lien date for the 2018–19 fiscal year, would require the full cash value of commercial and industrial property, as defined, to be the fair market value of that property as of the lien date. This measure would require the Legislature to provide by statute for the phase in of the reassessment of commercial and industrial property for fair market value in order to ensure a reasonable workload and implementation period for county assessors and taxpayers. This measure would establish the Local School and Community College Property Tax Fund in the State Treasury, which would be continuously appropriated for the support of school districts, charter schools, schools operated by county offices of education, and community college districts. The measure would require the Controller to allocate 11% of the moneys in the fund to community college districts based on an equal amount per unit of full-time equivalent student receiving educational services, and 89% of the moneys in the fund to school districts, charter schools, and county offices of education. For school districts, charter schools, and county offices of education, the measure would require the Superintendent of Public Instruction to allocate the moneys based on a formula that would include a base grant, a supplemental grant, and a concentration grant, as specified. The measure would require moneys from the fund to support the K–14 educational program for instructional improvement and accountability, and would prohibit them from being used to pay administrative costs. The measure would require school districts, charter schools, and county offices of education to demonstrate through their local control and accountability plans that they are increasing or improving services for unduplicated pupils in proportion to the increase in funds they receive pursuant to those supplemental and concentration grant allocations. The measure would prohibit moneys in the fund from being subject to appropriation, reversion, or a transfer by the Legislature, Governor, Director of Finance, or Controller for any purpose other than those specified in the measure, or from being loaned to the General Fund or any other fund of the state or any local government fund. The measure would, among other things, provide that moneys appropriated by the fund shall not be applied toward the minimum funding requirements for school districts and community college districts imposed by Section 8 of Article XVI of the California Constitution, and that they shall not be considered for purposes of calculations relating to the Budget Stabilization Account or the Public School System Stabilization Account. This measure, for each fiscal year beginning with the 2018–19 fiscal year to the 2020–21 fiscal year, inclusive, would require the county assessor to make specified calculations to determine the total "baseline assessed value" and the "incremental assessed percentage" of commercial and industrial property, and to identify the "total revised assessed value" of all commercial and industrial property in the county as determined following the reassessment of commercial and industrial property. This measure would require the county assessor to make additional calculations using the total revised assessed value and the incremental assessed value to determine the incremental revenues available for distribution. This measure, beginning with the 2018–19 fiscal year and for each fiscal year thereafter, would require an amount equal to the reduction in revenues derived from the taxes imposed pursuant to the Personal Income Tax Law and the Corporation Tax Law for each county resulting from the higher property taxes due to the reassessment of commercial and industrial properties and the lower property taxes due to the exemptions described above as estimated by the Franchise Tax Board, to be transferred by each county auditor to the state General Fund and the Mental Health Services Fund, as provided. This measure, beginning with the 2018–19 fiscal year to the 2020–21 fiscal year, inclusive, would require the county auditor, after transferring the amounts as so described to the state General Fund and the Mental Health Services Fund, to make specified determinations and calculations with respect to the remaining incremental revenues, and to transfer specified amounts to the Controller for deposit in the Local School and Community College Property Tax Fund, for allocation and distribution, as described above. This measure would require the balance of the incremental revenues remaining after transferring the amounts as so described to the Controller to be allocated among local agencies. This measure would require the county auditor to report the incremental revenues available for distribution and calculation made, along with supporting documentation, to the Controller, and would require the Controller to certify that the calculation was properly made and to post the percentage figure for each county on the Controller's Internet Web site. This measure, for the 2021–22 fiscal year, would require the county assessor to perform the calculations described above, and would require the county auditor to report the resulting percentage to the Controller. This measure, for the 2021–22 fiscal year and each fiscal year thereafter, would require the county auditor to make the determinations and calculation described above, and to transfer the resulting property tax revenues to the Controller for deposit in the Local School and Community College Property Tax Fund, and would require the balance of the incremental revenues to be allocated among local agencies. This measure would require all local education agencies, community colleges, counties, cities and counties, cities, and special districts that receive funds from the new revenues generated by the reassessment of commercial and industrial properties to publicly disclose the amount of property tax revenues received, as specified, and how those revenues were spent, and to publish online all public disclosures, with a copy of each disclosure to the Controller. This measure would require all annual public audits required of local education agencies, community colleges, counties, cities and counties, cities, and special districts that receive funds from the new revenues generated by the reassessment of commercial and industrial properties to disclose the amount of property tax revenues received, as specified, and to confirm whether the use of those revenues is consistent with the requirements of this measure. This measure would authorize expenses incurred by local education agencies to comply with these audit and disclosure requirements to be paid with funding from the Local School and Community College Property Tax Fund. The California Constitution prohibits the annual appropriations subject to limitation of any entity of state or local government from exceeding its adjusted annual appropriations limit. The California Constitution defines "appropriations subject to limitation" as any authorization to expend during a fiscal year the proceeds of taxes levied by or for that entity, and defines "proceeds of taxes" to include all tax revenues and the proceeds to an entity of government from specified sources. This measure would prohibit proceeds of taxes, and appropriations subject to limitation of each entity of government, from including tax revenues generated by the reassessment of commercial and industrial property under this measure. The California Constitution requires the state, whenever the Legislature or a state agency mandates a new program or higher level of service on any local government, to provide a subvention of funds to reimburse the local government, with specified exceptions. This measure would exclude the duty to collect the tax revenues generated by the reassessment of commercial and industrial property under this measure from being considered a new program or higher level of service mandated by the state. This measure would, however, authorize the board of supervisors of a county or city and county to direct the county auditor to allocate to the county or city and county an amount equal to the actual direct administrative costs associated with the implementation of the reassessment of commercial and industrial property.

Bill Sponsors (2)

Votes


No votes to display

Actions


Apr 12, 2016

Senate

From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F.

  • Referral-Committee
  • Reading-2
  • Amendment-Passage
  • Committee-Passage
  • Reading-1
Com. on GOV. & F.

Jul 16, 2015

Senate

From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F.

  • Referral-Committee
  • Reading-2
  • Amendment-Passage
  • Committee-Passage
  • Reading-1
Com. on GOV. & F.

Jul 08, 2015

Senate

From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F.

  • Referral-Committee
  • Reading-2
  • Amendment-Passage
  • Committee-Passage
  • Reading-1
Com. on GOV. & F.

Jun 09, 2015

Senate

From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F.

  • Referral-Committee
  • Reading-2
  • Amendment-Passage
  • Committee-Passage
  • Reading-1
Com. on GOV. & F.

Apr 07, 2015

Senate

Referred to Coms. on GOV. & F., E. & C.A., and APPR.

  • Referral-Committee
Coms. on GOV. & F., E. & C.A., and APPR.

Mar 27, 2015

Senate

From printer. May be acted upon on or after April 26.

Mar 26, 2015

Senate

Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Bill Text

Bill Text Versions Format
SCA5 HTML
03/26/15 - Introduced PDF
06/09/15 - Amended Senate PDF
07/08/15 - Amended Senate PDF
07/16/15 - Amended Senate PDF
04/12/16 - Amended Senate PDF

Related Documents

Document Format
No related documents.

Sources

Data on Open States is updated periodically throughout the day from the official website of the California State Legislature.

If you notice any inconsistencies with these official sources, feel free to file an issue.