SB 589

  • California Senate Bill
  • 2015-2016 Regular Session
  • Introduced in Senate Feb 26, 2015
  • Passed Senate May 22, 2015
  • Passed Assembly Aug 27, 2015
  • Signed by Governor Oct 10, 2015

Voting: voter registration: individuals with disabilities and conservatees.

Abstract

(1) Existing law requires that a person be registered as a voter by affidavit of registration and provides that a properly executed registration is deemed effective if it is received on or before the 15th day before an election to be held in the registrant's precinct. Existing law requires the affidavit of registration to show certain information of the affiant and requires the affiant to certify the content of the affidavit as to its truth and correctness, under penalty of perjury, with the signature of the affiant's name and the date of signing, except that if the affiant is unable to write, a mark or cross must be used to sign the affidavit. This bill would authorize an individual with a disability who is otherwise qualified to vote to complete an affidavit of registration with reasonable accommodations as needed. The bill would also authorize an individual with a disability who is under a conservatorship to be registered to vote if he or she has not been disqualified from voting. The bill would authorize an affiant who is an individual with a disability to complete the affidavit of registration with reasonable accommodations as needed. The bill would find and declare that by explicitly adding the concept of reasonable accommodation to state laws on voter qualification, the bill brings the state into compliance with federal standards. (2) Existing law deems a person mentally incompetent, and therefore disqualified from voting if, during certain proceedings including conservatorship proceedings, the court finds that the person is incapable of completing an affidavit of voter registration. Existing law, in certain conservatorship proceedings heard by a jury, requires the jury to unanimously find that the person is incapable of completing an affidavit of registration before the person is disqualified from voting. If an order establishing a conservatorship is made and in connection with the order it is found that the person is incapable of completing an affidavit of voter registration, existing law requires the court to forward the order and determination to the county elections official of the person's county of residence. Existing law, during the yearly or biennial review of certain conservatorships, requires the court investigator to review the person's capability of completing an affidavit of voter registration and, if the conservatee's capability of completing the affidavit of voter registration changes, requires the court investigator to inform the court and the court to hold a hearing regarding that capability. This bill would instead require that a person be presumed competent to vote, regardless of his or her conservatorship status, and would require that a person be deemed mentally incompetent, and therefore disqualified from voting if, during certain proceedings including conservatorship proceedings, the court finds by clear and convincing evidence that the person cannot communicate, with or without reasonable accommodations, a desire to participate in the voting process. In certain conservatorship proceedings heard by a jury, the bill would require the jury to instead unanimously find by clear and convincing evidence that the person cannot communicate, with or without reasonable accommodations, a desire to participate in the voting process before the person is disqualified from voting. The bill would also require an order establishing a conservatorship to instead find by clear and convincing evidence that the person cannot communicate, with or without reasonable accommodations, a desire to participate in the voting process before the court is required to forward the order and determination to the county elections official of the person's county of residence. The bill, during the yearly or biennial review of certain conservatorships, would instead require the court investigator to review the person's capability of communicating, with or without reasonable accommodations, a desire to participate in the voting process, and if the conservatee's capability of communicating that desire has changed, would require the court investigator to inform the court and the court to hold a hearing regarding that capability. (3) Existing law regulates the terms and conditions of conservatorships and requires a court clerk, if a conservatorship petition is filed by a person other than the proposed conservatee, to issue a citation to the proposed conservatee that includes, among other things, a statement that the proposed conservatee may be disqualified from voting if he or she is incapable of completing an affidavit of voter registration, and a statement that the proposed conservatee will not be disqualified from voting if he or she would need to complete the affidavit by signing it with a mark, cross, or signature stamp, or with the assistance of another person. Existing law requires a court hearing on a petition for the appointment of a conservator and requires a court investigator, before the court hearing and as part of periodic review after the appointment of the conservator to, among other things, determine if the proposed conservatee is incapable of completing an affidavit of voter registration, as specified, and may be disqualified from voting. Existing law provides that a conservatee is not disqualified from voting on the basis that he or she would need to complete the affidavit by signing it with a mark, cross, or signature stamp, or with the assistance of another person. This bill would require the court clerk's citation to the proposed conservatee, as described above, to instead include a statement that the proposed conservatee may be disqualified from voting if he or she is incapable of communicating, with or without reasonable accommodations, a desire to participate in the voting process, and a statement that the proposed conservatee will not be disqualified from voting if he or she would also need to complete the affidavit with reasonable accommodations. The bill would require the court investigator, before the court hearing and as part of periodic reviews after the appointment of a conservator to, among other things, instead determine whether the proposed conservatee is incapable of communicating, with or without reasonable accommodations, a desire to participate in the voting process, and may be disqualified from voting. The bill would also provide that a conservatee is not disqualified from voting on the basis that he or she would need to complete the affidavit with reasonable accommodations. By requiring local officials to perform additional duties, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (4) This bill would also make technical, nonsubstantive changes to these provisions. (5) This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 2102 of the Elections Code, proposed by AB 1461, that would become operative only if AB 1461 and this bill are both chaptered and become effective on or before January 1, 2016, and this bill is chaptered last. The bill would also incorporate additional changes to Sections 2150, 2208, and 2209 of the Elections Code, proposed by AB 1020, that would become operative only if AB 1020 and this bill are both chaptered and become effective on or before January 1, 2016, and this bill is chaptered last. (6) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.

Bill Sponsors (2)

Votes


Actions


Oct 10, 2015

California State Legislature

Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 736, Statutes of 2015.

California State Legislature

Approved by the Governor.

Sep 01, 2015

California State Legislature

Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4:30 p.m.

Aug 31, 2015

Senate

Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 27. Noes 11. Page 2272.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.

Aug 27, 2015

Assembly

Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 62. Noes 11. Page 2626.) Ordered to the Senate.

Senate

In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.

Aug 20, 2015

Assembly

Ordered to third reading.

Assembly

Read third time and amended.

Jul 16, 2015

Assembly

Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

Jul 15, 2015

Assembly

From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 4.) (July 15).

Jul 07, 2015

Assembly

From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 1.) (July 7). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  • Referral-Committee
  • Committee-Passage-Favorable
  • Committee-Passage
Com. on APPR.

Jul 01, 2015

Assembly

From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (July 1). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

  • Referral-Committee
  • Committee-Passage-Favorable
  • Committee-Passage
Com. on JUD.

Jun 18, 2015

Assembly

From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on E. & R.

  • Referral-Committee
  • Reading-2
  • Amendment-Passage
  • Committee-Passage
  • Reading-1
Com. on E. & R.

Jun 11, 2015

Assembly

Referred to Coms. on E. & R. and JUD.

  • Referral-Committee
Coms. on E. & R. and JUD.

May 22, 2015

Assembly

In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

Senate

Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 27. Noes 10. Page 1061.) Ordered to the Assembly.

May 12, 2015

Senate

Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

May 11, 2015

Senate

From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.

May 01, 2015

Senate

Set for hearing May 11.

Apr 29, 2015

Senate

From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 1. Page 819.) (April 28). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  • Referral-Committee
  • Committee-Passage-Favorable
  • Committee-Passage
Com. on APPR.

Apr 23, 2015

Senate

Set for hearing April 28.

Apr 22, 2015

Senate

From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on RLS. (Ayes 4. Noes 1. Page 723.) (April 21). Re-referred to Com. on RLS.

  • Referral-Committee
  • Committee-Passage-Favorable
  • Committee-Passage
Com. on RLS.

Senate

Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

  • Referral-Committee
Com. on JUD.

Apr 09, 2015

Senate

Set for hearing April 21.

Apr 06, 2015

Senate

From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on E. & C.A.

  • Referral-Committee
  • Reading-2
  • Amendment-Passage
  • Committee-Passage
  • Reading-1
Com. on E. & C.A.

Senate

April 7 set for first hearing canceled at the request of author.

Mar 24, 2015

Senate

Set for hearing April 7.

Mar 12, 2015

Senate

Referred to Com. on E. & C.A.

  • Referral-Committee
Com. on E. & C.A.

Feb 27, 2015

Senate

From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 29.

Feb 26, 2015

Senate

Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Bill Text

Bill Text Versions Format
SB589 HTML
02/26/15 - Introduced PDF
04/06/15 - Amended Senate PDF
06/18/15 - Amended Assembly PDF
08/20/15 - Amended Assembly PDF
08/31/15 - Enrolled PDF
10/10/15 - Chaptered PDF

Related Documents

Document Format
No related documents.

Sources

Data on Open States is updated periodically throughout the day from the official website of the California State Legislature.

If you notice any inconsistencies with these official sources, feel free to file an issue.