Marty Block
- Democratic
Author
Existing law, until January 1, 2020, requires an application for an order authorizing the interception of a wire, oral, or other specified electronic communication to be made in writing upon the personal oath or affirmation of the Attorney General, Chief Deputy Attorney General, or Chief Assistant Attorney General, Criminal Law Division, or of a district attorney. Existing law, until January 1, 2020, authorizes the court to issue an order authorizing interception of those communications if the judge finds, among other things, that there is probable cause to believe that an individual is committing, has committed, or is about to commit, one of several offenses, including, among others, possession for sale of certain controlled substances, murder, and certain felonies involving destructive devices. This bill would add money laundering to the list of offenses for which interception of electronic communication may be ordered pursuant to those provisions if certain requirements are met, as specified.
Returned to Secretary of Senate pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
May 28 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.
Set for hearing May 28.
April 27 hearing: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
Set for hearing April 27.
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0. Page 595.) (April 14). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
Set for hearing April 14.
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 26.
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
| Bill Text Versions | Format |
|---|---|
| SB298 | HTML |
| 02/23/15 - Introduced |
| Document | Format |
|---|---|
| No related documents. |
Data on Open States is updated periodically throughout the day from the official website of the California State Legislature.
If you notice any inconsistencies with these official sources, feel free to file an issue.