AB 2477

  • California Assembly Bill
  • 2015-2016 Regular Session
  • Introduced in Assembly Feb 19, 2016
  • Assembly
  • Senate
  • Governor

Victim restitution: jurisdiction.

Abstract

Existing law requires a court to impose a separate and additional restitution fine in each case in which a person is convicted of a crime. If the economic losses of a victim cannot be ascertained at the time of sentencing, existing law requires a court to retain jurisdiction over a person subject to a restitution order for purposes of imposing or modifying restitution until such time as the losses may be determined. Two state appellate court decisions have held that under state law a court acts in excess of its jurisdiction by ordering restitution or modifying a restitution order after the explanation of a defendant's probation. This bill would expressly abrogate the holdings in those decisions by requiring the court to retain jurisdiction over a defendant for purposes of imposing or modifying restitution at any time.

Bill Sponsors (3)

Votes


Actions


Apr 21, 2016

Assembly

From committee: Without further action pursuant to Joint Rule 62(a).

Apr 20, 2016

Assembly

In committee: Set, second hearing. Failed passage.

Mar 29, 2016

Assembly

In committee: Set, first hearing. Failed passage. Reconsideration granted.

Mar 08, 2016

Assembly

Referred to Com. on PUB. S.

  • Referral-Committee
Com. on PUB. S.

Feb 22, 2016

Assembly

Read first time.

Feb 21, 2016

Assembly

From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.

Feb 19, 2016

Assembly

Introduced. To print.

Bill Text

Bill Text Versions Format
AB2477 HTML
02/19/16 - Introduced PDF

Related Documents

Document Format
No related documents.

Sources

Data on Open States is updated periodically throughout the day from the official website of the California State Legislature.

If you notice any inconsistencies with these official sources, feel free to file an issue.