AB 1389

  • California Assembly Bill
  • 2015-2016 Regular Session
  • Introduced in Assembly Feb 27, 2015
  • Assembly
  • Senate
  • Governor

Agricultural labor relations: unfair labor practices.

Abstract

(1) Existing law establishes the right of agricultural employees to form, join, or assist labor organizations to engage in collective bargaining activities with agricultural employers regarding wages, working conditions, or other aspects of employment. Existing law prohibits a labor organization or its agents from engaging in specified unfair labor practices. This bill would additionally prohibit a labor organization from abandoning or failing to represent a bargaining unit for 3 or more years. This bill would require the Agricultural Labor Relations Board to decertify a labor organization that violates this provision. (2) Existing law specifies the time for filing a declaration by an agricultural employer or a certified labor organization representing agricultural employees that the parties have failed to reach a collective bargaining agreement, thus triggering mandatory mediation. Once triggered, the mediation under these provisions is immediately scheduled at a time and location reasonably accessible to the parties and proceeds for 30 days, with an additional 30-day extension upon the mutual agreement of the parties. This bill would deem members of the bargaining unit to be parties for the purposes of the mediation. Existing law establishes the conditions and time periods under which an agricultural employer, as defined, or a certified labor organization representing agricultural employees may file a declaration with the Agricultural Labor Relations Board stating that the parties have failed to reach a collective bargaining agreement, thus triggering a board order for mandatory mediation. Existing law authorizes a party, within 60 days of the order by the Agricultural Labor Relations Board taking effect, to file an action to enforce the order. Existing law prohibits an order of the board from being stayed during the pendency of any appeal of the order unless the appellant demonstrates that he or she is likely to prevail on the merits and that he or she will be irreparably harmed by implementation of the board's order. This bill would condition the effect and enforcement of an order resulting from the binding mediation on the order being approved by a majority of the members of the affected bargaining unit.

Bill Sponsors (3)

Votes


Actions


Feb 01, 2016

Assembly

From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.

Jan 31, 2016

Assembly

Died pursuant to Article IV, Sec. 10(c) of the Constitution.

May 06, 2015

Assembly

In committee: Set, first hearing. Failed passage. Reconsideration granted.

May 05, 2015

Assembly

Re-referred to Com. on L. & E.

  • Referral-Committee
Com. on L. & E.

May 04, 2015

Assembly

From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on L. & E. Read second time and amended.

Mar 23, 2015

Assembly

Referred to Com. on L. & E.

  • Referral-Committee
Com. on L. & E.

Mar 02, 2015

Assembly

Read first time.

Mar 01, 2015

Assembly

From printer. May be heard in committee March 31.

Feb 27, 2015

Assembly

Introduced. To print.

Bill Text

Bill Text Versions Format
AB1389 HTML
02/27/15 - Introduced PDF
05/04/15 - Amended Assembly PDF

Related Documents

Document Format
No related documents.

Sources

Data on Open States is updated periodically throughout the day from the official website of the California State Legislature.

If you notice any inconsistencies with these official sources, feel free to file an issue.