SB 731

  • California Senate Bill
  • 2013-2014 Regular Session
  • Introduced in Senate Feb 22, 2013
  • Passed Senate May 29, 2013
  • Assembly
  • Governor

Environment: California Environmental Quality Act.

Abstract

(1) The California Environmental Quality Act, or CEQA, requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of, an environmental impact report, or EIR, on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. CEQA also requires a lead agency to prepare a mitigated negative declaration for a project that may have a significant effect on the environment if revisions in the project would avoid or mitigate that effect and there is no substantial evidence that the project, as revised, would have a significant effect on the environment. CEQA requires the Office of Planning and Research to develop and prepare, and the Secretary of the Natural Resources Agency to certify and adopt, guidelines for the implementation of CEQA by public agencies. CEQA establishes a procedure for the preparation and certification of the record of proceedings upon the filing of an action or proceeding challenging a lead agency's action on the grounds of noncompliance with CEQA. CEQA establishes time periods within which a person is required to bring a judicial action or proceeding to challenge a public agency's action taken pursuant to CEQA. This bill would provide that aesthetic and parking impacts of a residential, mixed-use residential, or employment center project, as defined, on an infill site, as defined, within a transit priority area, as defined, shall not be considered significant impacts on the environment. The bill would require the office to prepare and submit to the Secretary of the Natural Resources Agency, and the secretary to certify and adopt, revisions to the guidelines for the implementation of CEQA establishing thresholds of significance for noise and transportation impacts of projects within transit priority areas. The bill would require the office, on or before July 1, 2015, to prepare, develop, and transmit to the secretary recommended proposed changes or amendments to the guidelines establishing criteria for a lead agency to assess the need for translating specified notices into non-English languages and requirements for the posting of those notices in non-English languages. Because the bill would require the development of guidelines that would require a lead agency to translate notices into non-English languages and to post those translated notices, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would require the office to produce a report on economic displacement and would require the office to publicly circulate a draft of the report. The bill would require the lead agency, in making specified findings, to make those findings available to the public at least 10 days prior to the adoption of the findings and to provide specified notice of the availability of the findings for public review. Because the bill would require the lead agency to make the draft finding available for public review and to provide specified notices to the public, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would require the lead agency, at the request of a project applicant for specified projects, to, among other things, prepare a record of proceedings concurrently with the preparation of negative declarations, mitigated negative declarations, EIRs, or other environmental documents for specified projects. Because the bill would require a lead agency to prepare the record of proceedings as provided, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would authorize the tolling of the time period in which a person is required to bring a judicial action or proceeding challenging a public agency's action taken pursuant to CEQA through a tolling agreement that does not exceed 4 years. The bill would authorize the extension of the tolling agreement. (2) CEQA provides certain streamlinings benefits for transit priority projects and specifies criteria for projects to be considered transit priority projects. This bill would revise those criteria. (3) For mitigation measures required pursuant to an EIR or a mitigated negative declaration, CEQA requires the lead agency to adopt a reporting and monitoring program to ensure compliance with those required mitigation measures during project implementation. This bill would require the lead agency, upon the request of a member of the public, to prepare or cause to be prepared a report on project compliance with the required mitigation measures, as a part of the mitigation and monitoring plan, that is publicly available online. Because the lead agency would be required to prepare and make available this report, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (4) Existing law exempts from the requirements of CEQA residential development projects that are undertaken to implement, and are consistent with a specific plan for which an EIR has been certified after January 1, 1980. Existing law provides that this exemption does not apply if, after the certification of the EIR, a specified event occurs, unless a supplemental EIR for the specified plan is prepared and certified. This bill would specify that the event does not include new information consisting solely of specified information. (5) CEQA requires the court, if the court finds that a public agency has violated the requirements of CEQA, to issue an order containing specified mandates. This bill would require the court to issue an order that includes a peremptory writ of mandate specifying actions that a public agency needs to take to comply with the requirements of CEQA. The bill would require the writ to specify the time by which the public agency is to file an initial return to a writ containing specified information. Because a public agency would be required to file an initial return to a writ, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (6) CEQA requires every person bringing an action or proceeding alleging a violation of CEQA to furnish to the Attorney General a copy of the pleading within 10 days after filing and a copy of any amended or supplemental pleading. This bill would require the California Research Bureau, subject to the availability of funding and of information, to annually submit to the Legislature a report containing specified information on CEQA litigation in the state. (7) Existing law requires the regional transportation plan for regions of the state with a metropolitan planning organization to each adopt a sustainable communities strategy, as part of their regional transportation plan, as specified, designed to achieve certain goals for the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions from automobiles and light trucks in a region. Existing law establishes the Strategic Growth Council to manage and award grants and loans to support the planning and development of sustainable communities strategies. This bill would state the intent of the Legislature to appropriate $30,000,000 annually by the council for the purposes of providing competitive grants to local agencies for planning activities for the implementation of the sustainable communities strategy. (8) Existing law requires the development, adoption, and updating of a congestion management program for each county that includes an urbanized area, as defined. The plan is required to contain specified elements and to be submitted to regional agencies, as defined, for determination of whether the program is consistent with regional transportation plans. The regional agency is then directed to monitor the implementation of all elements of each congestion management program. The required elements include traffic level of service standards for a system of designated highways and roadways. Existing law defines "infill opportunity zone" for purposes of the above-described provisions and exempts streets and highways in an infill opportunity zone from the level of service standards specified in the above-described provisions and instead requires alternate level of service standards to be applied. Existing law prohibits a city or county from designating an infill opportunity zone after December 31, 2009. This bill would revise the definition of "infill opportunity zone," as specified. The bill would authorize the designation of an infill opportunity zone that is a transit priority area within a sustainable communities strategy or alternative planning strategy adopted by an applicable metropolitan planning organization. (9) Existing law terminates the designation of an infill opportunity zone if no development project is completed within that zone within 4 years from the date of the designation. This bill would repeal this provision. (10) This bill would, until January 1, 2017, establish in the office of the Governor the position of Advisor on Renewable Energy Facilities. (11) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.

Bill Sponsors (2)

Votes


Actions


Nov 30, 2014

Assembly

From Assembly without further action.

Assembly

From committee without further action.

Sep 11, 2013

Assembly

From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (September 10). Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.

  • Committee-Passage-Favorable
  • Referral-Committee
  • Committee-Passage
Com. on L. GOV.

Assembly

Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

Assembly

Joint Rule 62(a) file notice suspended. (Page 3247.)

Sep 09, 2013

Assembly

Joint Rule 62(a) file notice suspended. (Page 3032.)

Assembly

From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.

  • Committee-Passage
  • Amendment-Passage
  • Reading-2
  • Reading-1
  • Referral-Committee
Com. on NAT. RES.

Assembly

Re-referred to Coms. on NAT. RES. and L. GOV. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.

  • Referral-Committee
Coms. on NAT. RES. and L. GOV. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.

Sep 06, 2013

Assembly

Ordered to third reading.

Assembly

Read third time and amended. (Ayes 53. Noes 24. Page 2947.)

Sep 03, 2013

Assembly

Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

Aug 30, 2013

Assembly

From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (August 30).

Aug 21, 2013

Assembly

Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  • Referral-Committee
APPR. suspense file. APPR

Aug 15, 2013

Assembly

From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (August 14). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  • Committee-Passage-Favorable
  • Referral-Committee
  • Committee-Passage
Com. on APPR.

Aug 06, 2013

Assembly

Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.

  • Amendment-Passage
  • Reading-2
  • Reading-1
  • Referral-Committee
Com. on L. GOV.

Aug 05, 2013

Assembly

From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. (Ayes 6. Noes 1.) (July 1).

Jun 17, 2013

Assembly

Referred to Coms. on NAT. RES. and L. GOV.

  • Referral-Committee
Coms. on NAT. RES. and L. GOV.

May 30, 2013

Assembly

In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

May 29, 2013

Senate

Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 1181.) Ordered to the Assembly.

May 24, 2013

Senate

Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.

May 23, 2013

Senate

From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 1019.) (May 23).

May 21, 2013

Senate

Set for hearing May 23.

May 20, 2013

Senate

Placed on APPR. suspense file.

May 10, 2013

Senate

Set for hearing May 20.

May 07, 2013

Senate

Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  • Amendment-Passage
  • Reading-2
  • Reading-1
  • Referral-Committee
Com. on APPR.

May 06, 2013

Senate

From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0. Page 790.) (May 1).

Apr 26, 2013

Senate

Set for hearing May 1.

Apr 25, 2013

Senate

Re-referred to Com. on E.Q.

  • Referral-Committee
Com. on E.Q.

Apr 23, 2013

Senate

From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.

  • Committee-Passage
  • Amendment-Passage
  • Reading-2
  • Reading-1
  • Referral-Committee
Com. on RLS.

Mar 11, 2013

Senate

Referred to Com. on RLS.

  • Referral-Committee
Com. on RLS.

Feb 25, 2013

Senate

Read first time.

Feb 23, 2013

Senate

From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 25.

Feb 22, 2013

Senate

Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Bill Text

Bill Text Versions Format
SB731 HTML
02/22/13 - Introduced PDF
04/23/13 - Amended Senate PDF
05/07/13 - Amended Senate PDF
05/24/13 - Amended Senate PDF
08/06/13 - Amended Assembly PDF
09/06/13 - Amended Assembly PDF
09/09/13 - Amended Assembly PDF

Related Documents

Document Format
No related documents.

Sources

Data on Open States is updated periodically throughout the day from the official website of the California State Legislature.

If you notice any inconsistencies with these official sources, feel free to file an issue.