V. Manuel Pérez
- Democratic
Author
Under existing law, the Lanterman Developmental Disabilities Services Act, the State Department of Developmental Services contracts with regional centers to provide services and supports to individuals with developmental disabilities. Existing law requires the department to implement a quality assessment system, as prescribed, to enable the department to assess the performance of the state's developmental services system and to improve services for consumers. Under existing law, the department is required, in consultation with stakeholders, to identify a valid and reliable quality assurance instrument that assesses consumer and family satisfaction, provision of services, and personal outcomes, and, among other things, includes outcome-based measures such as health, safety, and well-being. Under existing law, the department is required to contract with an independent agency or organization that is, in part, experienced in designing valid quality assurance instruments, to implement the system. This bill would additionally require the quality assurance instrument to assess the provision of services in a linguistically and culturally competent manner and include outcome-based measures to evaluate the linguistic and cultural competency of regional center services that are provided to consumers across their lifetimes. This bill would require the independent agency or organization the department contracts with to be experienced in issues relating to linguistic and cultural competency. The bill would include legislative findings and declarations.
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 679, Statutes of 2013.
Approved by the Governor.
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4:30 p.m.
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 75. Noes 0. Page 2933.).
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 6 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 2104.).
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
Action rescinded whereby the bill was read third time, passed, and to Assembly.
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
In Senate. Held at Desk.
Ordered to the Senate.
Action rescinded whereby the Assembly concurred in Senate amendments.
Withdrawn from Engrossing and Enrolling.
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 71. Noes 0. Page 2287.).
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after July 3 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 33. Noes 0. Page 1607.).
Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and ordered to consent calendar.
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: to consent calendar. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (June 11).
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 73. Noes 0. Page 1328.)
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (May 1).
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 16). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
Read first time.
From printer. May be heard in committee March 26.
Introduced. To print.
| Bill Text Versions | Format |
|---|---|
| AB1232 | HTML |
| 02/22/13 - Introduced | |
| 06/13/13 - Amended Senate | |
| 08/22/13 - Amended Senate | |
| 09/12/13 - Enrolled | |
| 10/09/13 - Chaptered |
| Document | Format |
|---|---|
| No related documents. |
Data on Open States is updated periodically throughout the day from the official website of the California State Legislature.
If you notice any inconsistencies with these official sources, feel free to file an issue.