SB 1486

  • California Senate Bill
  • 2011-2012 Regular Session
  • Introduced in Senate Feb 24, 2012
  • Senate
  • Assembly
  • Governor

Food facilities: menu labeling.

Abstract

The Sherman Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Law contains various provisions regarding the contents, packaging, labeling, and advertising of food, drugs, and cosmetics. The California Retail Food Code provides for the regulation of health and sanitation standards for retail food facilities, as defined, by the State Department of Public Health. Under existing law, local health agencies are primarily responsible for enforcing the California Retail Food Code. A violation of any of these provisions is punishable as a misdemeanor. The code requires fish that are received for sale or service to be commercially and legally caught or harvested. The code also imposes various labeling and storage requirements for shellstock. This bill would require a retail food facility, as defined, that offers or sells as a menu item seafood, as defined, to identify specified information regarding the seafood and, if the retail food facility has a drive-through area and uses a menu board to display or list menu items, to disclose on this menu board a statement that this specified information is available upon request. The bill would require the department or local enforcement agencies to enforce these provisions, as specified, and would make a violation an infraction or subject to a civil penalty. The bill would provide an exception to these enforcement provisions for food facilities that were provided inaccurate information by the entity that provided the seafood. By expanding the definition of a crime and imposing additional duties upon local officials, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.

Bill Sponsors (2)

De León

     
Coauthor

Votes


Actions


Apr 26, 2012

Senate

From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on RLS. (Ayes 5. Noes 3. Page 3307.) (April 25). Re-referred to Com. on RLS.

  • Referral-Committee
  • Committee-Passage
  • Committee-Passage-Favorable
Com. on RLS.

Apr 16, 2012

Senate

From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.

  • Reading-2
  • Reading-1
  • Committee-Passage
  • Amendment-Passage
  • Referral-Committee
Com. on HEALTH.

Apr 11, 2012

Senate

Set for hearing April 25.

Apr 09, 2012

Senate

Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.

  • Referral-Committee
Com. on HEALTH.

Mar 28, 2012

Senate

From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.

  • Reading-2
  • Reading-1
  • Committee-Passage
  • Amendment-Passage
  • Referral-Committee
Com. on RLS.

Mar 22, 2012

Senate

Referred to Com. on RLS.

  • Referral-Committee
Com. on RLS.

Feb 27, 2012

Senate

Read first time.

Feb 25, 2012

Senate

From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 26.

Feb 24, 2012

Senate

Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Bill Text

Bill Text Versions Format
SB1486 HTML
02/24/12 - Introduced PDF
03/28/12 - Amended Senate PDF
04/16/12 - Amended Senate PDF

Related Documents

Document Format
No related documents.

Sources

Data on Open States is updated periodically throughout the day from the official website of the California State Legislature.

If you notice any inconsistencies with these official sources, feel free to file an issue.