SB 1374

  • California Senate Bill
  • 2011-2012 Regular Session
  • Introduced in Senate Feb 24, 2012
  • Senate
  • Assembly
  • Governor

Liability: good faith reliance on administrative regulation.

Abstract

Existing law provides that every person is responsible, not only for the result of his or her willful acts, but also for an injury occasioned to another by his or her want of ordinary care or skill in the management of his or her property or person, except so far as the latter has, willfully or by want of ordinary care, brought the injury upon himself or herself. Existing law governs the tort liability and immunity of, and claims and actions against, public entities and their officers and employees. Existing law provides that a public employee who acts in good faith, without malice, and under the apparent authority of an enactment that is unconstitutional, invalid, or inapplicable, is not liable for an injury caused thereby, except to the extent that he or she would have been liable had the enactment been constitutional, valid, and applicable. This bill would provide that any person who relies upon a written order, ruling, approval, interpretation, or enforcement policy of a state agency shall not be liable or subject to punishment for a violation of a civil statute or regulation in a judicial or administrative proceeding if the person pleads and proves to the trier of fact that, at the time the alleged act or omission occurred, the person had sought an applicable written order, ruling, approval, interpretation, or enforcement policy from the state agency charged with interpreting that area of law, and relied upon and conformed to that order, ruling, approval, interpretation, or enforcement policy. The bill would provide that these provisions apply to all actions and proceedings that have not resulted in a final judgment on or after January 1, 2013, regardless of whether the action or proceeding was commenced, or based upon, an alleged act or omission that occurred before, on, or after January 1, 2013. Additionally, the bill would state that it would not require a state agency to issue an order, ruling, approval, interpretation, or enforcement policy.

Bill Sponsors (3)

Votes


Actions


May 08, 2012

Senate

Set, first hearing. Failed passage in committee. (Ayes 2. Noes 3. Page 3459.)

Apr 26, 2012

Senate

Set for hearing May 8.

Apr 23, 2012

Senate

From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

  • Reading-2
  • Reading-1
  • Committee-Passage
  • Amendment-Passage
  • Referral-Committee
Com. on JUD.

Apr 09, 2012

Senate

From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

  • Reading-2
  • Reading-1
  • Committee-Passage
  • Amendment-Passage
  • Referral-Committee
Com. on JUD.

Mar 08, 2012

Senate

Referred to Com. on JUD.

  • Referral-Committee
Com. on JUD.

Feb 27, 2012

Senate

Read first time.

Feb 26, 2012

Senate

From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 27.

Feb 24, 2012

Senate

Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Bill Text

Bill Text Versions Format
SB1374 HTML
02/24/12 - Introduced PDF
04/09/12 - Amended Senate PDF
04/23/12 - Amended Senate PDF

Related Documents

Document Format
No related documents.

Sources

Data on Open States is updated periodically throughout the day from the official website of the California State Legislature.

If you notice any inconsistencies with these official sources, feel free to file an issue.