Alyson Huber
- Democratic
Author
Existing law specifies the circumstances in which an undertaking is required in order for the enforcement of a judgment or order to be stayed on appeal, including if the judgment or order is for money or the payment of money, or for costs awarded pursuant to specified provisions. Existing law requires that the undertaking in these cases be for double the amount of the judgment or order unless given by an admitted surety insurer, in which event the judgment would be 112 times the amount of the judgment or order. This bill would provide that the undertaking be set at the amounts described above unless the court, after notice and hearing, and for good cause shown, determines that a different amount is appropriate. The bill would also make technical, nonsubstantive changes to these provisions.
From committee without further action pursuant to Joint Rule 62(a).
In committee: Set, first hearing. Failed passage.
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Read second time and amended.
Read first time.
From printer. May be heard in committee March 27.
Introduced. To print.
| Bill Text Versions | Format |
|---|---|
| AB2377 | HTML |
| 02/24/12 - Introduced | |
| 03/29/12 - Amended Assembly |
| Document | Format |
|---|---|
| No related documents. |
Data on Open States is updated periodically throughout the day from the official website of the California State Legislature.
If you notice any inconsistencies with these official sources, feel free to file an issue.