AB 227

  • California Assembly Bill
  • 2011-2012 Regular Session
  • Introduced in Assembly
  • Passed Assembly Apr 25, 2011
  • Senate
  • Governor

Education technology planning.

Abstract

Existing law requires that, as a precondition to receiving a technology grant administered by the State Department of Education, a school district shall have a current 3- to 5-year education technology plan, unless this requirement is waived by the State Board of Education. Existing law also requires the Superintendent of Public Instruction to develop guidelines and criteria for inclusion in the education technology plan, including a component to educate pupils and teachers on specified topics. This bill would expand that list of topics to include the prevention of, and legal consequences for, cyberbullying, the active use of content control software, and the responsible use by pupils of mobile communication technology. The bill would exempt from compliance with this requirement a school district that, on July 1, 2012, has a 3- to 5-year education technology plan until that plan expires or is voluntarily replaced, at which time the school district would be subject to the requirement. The bill would also require that the additional topics of the prevention of, and legal consequences for, cyberbullying, the active use of content control software, and the responsible use by pupils of mobile communication technology, be implemented only to the extent that state or federal funds are appropriated for those topics. The bill would make other conforming changes.

Bill Sponsors (7)

Votes


Actions


Aug 25, 2011

Senate

In committee: Held under submission.

Aug 22, 2011

Senate

From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  • Reading-2
  • Amendment-Introduction
  • Reading-1
  • Amendment-Passage
  • Referral-Committee
Com. on APPR.

Jul 11, 2011

Senate

In committee: Placed on APPR. suspense file.

Jun 30, 2011

Senate

From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 2.) (June 29). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  • Referral-Committee
  • Committee-Passage
  • Committee-Passage-Favorable
Com. on APPR.

Jun 06, 2011

Senate

In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

May 12, 2011

Senate

Referred to Com. on ED.

  • Referral-Committee
Com. on ED.

Apr 25, 2011

Assembly

Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 54. Noes 20. Page 1041.)

Senate

In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

Apr 14, 2011

Assembly

Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

Apr 13, 2011

Assembly

From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 3.) (April 13).

Apr 07, 2011

Assembly

Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  • Referral-Committee
Com. on APPR.

Apr 06, 2011

Assembly

Read second time and amended.

Apr 05, 2011

Assembly

From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 3.) (March 30).

Feb 10, 2011

Assembly

Referred to Com. on ED.

  • Referral-Committee
Com. on ED.

Feb 03, 2011

Assembly

From printer. May be heard in committee March 5.

Feb 02, 2011

Assembly

Read first time. To print.

Bill Text

Bill Text Versions Format
AB227 HTML
02/02/11 - Introduced PDF
04/06/11 - Amended Assembly PDF
08/22/11 - Amended Senate PDF

Related Documents

Document Format
No related documents.

Sources

Data on Open States is updated periodically throughout the day from the official website of the California State Legislature.

If you notice any inconsistencies with these official sources, feel free to file an issue.