Felipe Fuentes
- Democratic
Author
Existing law prohibits, with exceptions, the use of an electronic tracking device to determine the location or movement of a person. Under existing law a violation of these provisions is a misdemeanor. Existing law states that these provisions do not apply to the lawful use of an electronic tracking device by a law enforcement agency. Existing decisional law, in the case of U.S. v. Jones, holds that the attachment of a Global Positioning System (GPS) tracking device to a vehicle and the use of the device to track the vehicle is a search within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Existing law states the grounds upon which a search warrant may be issued, including when the property or things to be seized consist of any item or constitute any evidence that tends to show a felony has been committed, or tends to show that a particular person has committed a felony. This bill would allow a search warrant to be issued when the information to be received from the use of a tracking device constitutes evidence that tends to show that either a felony, a misdemeanor violation of the Fish and Game Code, or a misdemeanor violation of the Public Resources Code has been committed or is being committed, tends to show that a particular person has committed that act or is committing that act, or will assist in locating an individual that has committed or is committing that act. The bill would state that these provisions shall not be construed as creating a cause of action against any foreign or California corporation for providing location information. The bill would require that a tracking device search warrant issued pursuant to these provisions identify the person or property to be tracked, and specify a reasonable time that the device may be used, not to exceed 30 days, plus extensions, as provided. The bill would require that the warrant be executed within 10 days, as provided.
Approved by the Governor.
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 818, Statutes of 2012.
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3:30 p.m.
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 79. Noes 0. Page 6545.).
Assembly Rule 77 suspended. (Page 6488.)
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 36. Noes 0. Page 4886.).
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 30 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
From consent calendar.
Ordered to third reading.
Ordered to special consent calendar.
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (July 3).
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 72. Noes 0. Page 4674.)
Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
From committee: Do pass as amended. To consent calendar. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (April 17).
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Read second time and amended.
From printer. May be heard in committee March 25.
Read first time. To print.
| Bill Text Versions | Format |
|---|---|
| AB2055 | HTML |
| 02/23/12 - Introduced | |
| 03/29/12 - Amended Assembly | |
| 04/25/12 - Amended Assembly | |
| 08/07/12 - Amended Senate | |
| 08/22/12 - Amended Senate | |
| 09/11/12 - Enrolled | |
| 09/30/12 - Chaptered |
| Document | Format |
|---|---|
| No related documents. |
Data on Open States is updated periodically throughout the day from the official website of the California State Legislature.
If you notice any inconsistencies with these official sources, feel free to file an issue.