SB 700

  • California Senate Bill
  • 2009-2010 Regular Session
  • Introduced in Senate Feb 27, 2009
  • Passed Senate Jan 28, 2010
  • Passed Assembly Aug 23, 2010
  • Governor

Healing arts: peer review.

Abstract

Existing law provides for the professional review of specified healing arts licentiates through a peer review process. This bill would define the term "peer review" for purposes of those provisions. Under existing law, specified persons are required to file a report, designated as an "805 report," with a licensing board within 15 days after a specified action is taken against a person licensed by that board. This bill would also require specified persons to file a report with a licensing board within 15 days after a peer review body makes a decision or recommendation regarding the disciplinary action to be taken against a licentiate of that board based on the peer review body's determination, following formal investigation, that the licentiate may have engaged in various acts, including incompetence, substance abuse, excessive prescribing or furnishing of controlled substances, or sexual misconduct, among other things. The bill would authorize the board to inspect and copy certain documents in the record of that investigation. Existing law requires the board to maintain an 805 report for a period of 3 years after receipt. This bill would require the board to maintain the report electronically. Existing law authorizes the Medical Board of California, the Osteopathic Medical Board of California, and the Dental Board of California to inspect and copy certain documents in the record of any disciplinary proceeding resulting in action that is required to be reported in an 805 report. This bill would specify that the boards have the authority to also inspect, as permitted by other applicable law, any certified copy of medical records in the record of the disciplinary proceeding. Existing law requires specified healing arts boards to maintain a central file of their licensees containing, among other things, disciplinary information reported through 805 reports. Under this bill, if a court finds, in a final judgment, that the peer review resulting in the 805 report was conducted in bad faith and the licensee who is the subject of the report notifies the board of that finding, the board would be required to include that finding in the licensee's central file. Existing law requires the Medical Board of California, the Osteopathic Medical Board of California, and the California Board of Podiatric Medicine to disclose an 805 report to specified health care entities and to disclose certain hospital disciplinary actions to inquiring members of the public. Existing law also requires the Medical Board of California to post hospital disciplinary actions regarding its licensees on the Internet. This bill would prohibit those disclosures, and would require the Medical Board of California to remove certain information posted on the Internet, if a court finds, in a final judgment, that the peer review resulting in the 805 report or the hospital disciplinary action was conducted in bad faith and the licensee notifies the board of that finding. The bill would also require the Medical Board of California to include certain exculpatory or explanatory statements in those disclosures or postings and would require the board to post on the Internet a factsheet that explains and provides information on the 805 reporting requirements. Existing law also requires the Medical Board of California, the Osteopathic Medical Board of California, and the California Board of Podiatric Medicine to disclose to an inquiring member of the public information regarding enforcement actions taken against a licensee by the board or by another state or jurisdiction. This bill would also require those boards to make those disclosures regarding enforcement actions taken against former licensees. The bill would make related technical and nonsubstantive changes.

Bill Sponsors (2)

Negrete McLeod

     
Author

Votes


Actions


Sep 29, 2010

California State Legislature

Approved by Governor.

California State Legislature

Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 505, Statutes of 2010.

Sep 03, 2010

California State Legislature

Enrolled. To Governor at 11:45 a.m.

Aug 25, 2010

Senate

Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 35. Noes 0. Page 4892.) To enrollment.

Aug 24, 2010

Senate

In Senate. To unfinished business.

Aug 23, 2010

Assembly

Assembly Rule 69(d) suspended. (Page 6463.)

Assembly

Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 76. Noes 0. Page 6498.) To Senate.

Aug 20, 2010

Assembly

Read third time. Amended. (Page 6428.) To third reading.

Aug 12, 2010

Assembly

From Consent Calendar to third reading.

Aug 09, 2010

Assembly

Read second time. To Consent Calendar.

Aug 05, 2010

Assembly

From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.)

Assembly

(Heard in committee on August 4.)

Mar 23, 2010

Assembly

(Heard in committee on March 23.)

Assembly

From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  • Referral-Committee
  • Committee-Passage-Favorable
  • Committee-Passage
Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

Feb 11, 2010

Assembly

To Com. on B. & P.

Jan 28, 2010

Assembly

In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

Senate

Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 35. Noes 0. Page 2735.) To Assembly.

Jan 27, 2010

Senate

Read second time. To third reading.

Jan 26, 2010

Senate

From inactive file to second reading file.

Senate

Read second time. Amended. To second reading.

Jun 22, 2009

Senate

Placed on inactive file on request of Senator Negrete McLeod.

Senate

Senate Rule 43 suspended. (Ayes 30. Noes 1. Page 1373.)

Jun 16, 2009

Senate

Placed on third reading.

Senate

Withdrawn from committee.

Jun 03, 2009

Senate

Re-referred to Com. on RLS.

  • Referral-Committee
Com. on RLS.

Senate

Read third time. Refused passage. (Ayes 17. Noes 16. Page 1198.)

Senate

Motion to reconsider made by Senator Negrete McLeod.

Senate

Reconsideration granted.

Senate

(Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 1198.)

May 21, 2009

Senate

Read second time. To third reading.

May 20, 2009

Senate

Read third time. Amended. To second reading.

May 14, 2009

Senate

Reconsideration granted.

Senate

Motion to reconsider made by Senator Negrete McLeod.

Senate

Read third time. Refused passage. (Ayes 19. Noes 15. Page 901.)

May 12, 2009

Senate

Read second time. To third reading.

May 11, 2009

Senate

Read third time. Amended. To second reading.

May 05, 2009

Senate

Read second time. To third reading.

May 04, 2009

Senate

From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.

Apr 24, 2009

Senate

Set for hearing May 4.

Apr 22, 2009

Senate

Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  • Referral-Committee
  • Reading-2
  • Reading-1
Com. on APPR.

Apr 21, 2009

Senate

From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 2. Page 581.)

Apr 13, 2009

Senate

From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on B., P. & E.D.

  • Reading-1
  • Referral-Committee
  • Reading-2
  • Committee-Passage
Com. on B., P. & E.D.

Apr 02, 2009

Senate

Set for hearing April 20.

Apr 01, 2009

Senate

Hearing postponed by committee.

Mar 25, 2009

Senate

Set for hearing April 13.

Mar 19, 2009

Senate

To Coms. on B., P. & E.D. and RLS.

Mar 02, 2009

Senate

Read first time.

Feb 28, 2009

Senate

From print. May be acted upon on or after March 30.

Feb 27, 2009

Senate

Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Bill Text

Bill Text Versions Format
SB700 HTML
02/27/09 - Introduced PDF
04/13/09 - Amended Senate PDF
04/22/09 - Amended Senate PDF
05/11/09 - Amended Senate PDF
05/20/09 - Amended Senate PDF
01/26/10 - Amended Senate PDF
08/20/10 - Amended Assembly PDF
08/27/10 - Enrolled PDF
09/29/10 - Chaptered PDF

Related Documents

Document Format
No related documents.

Sources

Data on Open States is updated periodically throughout the day from the official website of the California State Legislature.

If you notice any inconsistencies with these official sources, feel free to file an issue.