Leland Yee
- Democratic
Author
Existing law requires the collection of fees for issuing marriage licenses and for confidential marriage licenses. Existing law requires the collection of a fee in addition to the basic fee for the issuance of a marriage license and for the issuance of an authorization for the performance of marriages without a license, in the amount of $23. Existing law requires the additional $23 fee to be collected by the county clerk for deposit into county domestic violence shelter-based programs special funds. Existing law requires fees collected in the special funds to be disbursed to approved domestic violence shelter-based programs that meet certain requirements on a yearly or more frequent basis. This bill would authorize a county board of supervisors to authorize an increase of the above-described fee from $23 to $33. Existing law provides that proposed or existing domestic violence shelter-based programs that meet the aforementioned requirements shall receive funding from the county domestic violence shelter-based programs special funds. This bill would, instead, provide that only existing domestic violence shelter-based programs that meet the requirements shall receive funding. Existing law allows specified local jurisdictions to retain fees received at the time of issuance of a marriage license in excess of the $23 fee. This bill would add Sonoma County as a jurisdiction to whom this provision applies. Existing law requires the money in the special funds to be disbursed using a request for qualification (RFQ) process. This bill would require the RFQ process to involve a determination of whether a domestic violence shelter-based program meets the aforementioned requirements. If a domestic violence shelter-based program meets those requirements, the bill would provide that the program has successfully completed the RFQ process. The bill would provide that an RFQ process shall not be construed to mean a competitive bidding process. Existing law authorizes a county to establish a program for reducing the incidence of domestic violence in the county by establishing or funding domestic violence shelter-based programs that meet the aforementioned requirements. Existing law authorizes geographically adjacent counties to combine their respective domestic violence shelter-based programs funds in order to establish one or more domestic violence shelter-based programs, in order to provide services to the clients of each county that combines its funds with another county. This bill would provide that a county may only fund a domestic violence shelter-based program that is located outside of the county if the funding county is funding all domestic violence shelter-based programs located within its borders that meet the aforementioned requirements and the program located outside of the funding county provides services to residents of the funding county.
Died on file.
In Senate. To unfinished business. (Veto)
Vetoed by Governor.
Enrolled. To Governor at 4 p.m.
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 21. Noes 14. Page 4931.) To enrollment.
From committee: That the Assembly amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 3. Noes 1. Page 4418.)
Set for hearing August 9.
From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on JUD. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10. (Ayes 4. Noes 0. Page 4378.) Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10.
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 49. Noes 27. Page 5851.) To Senate.
In Senate. To unfinished business.
Read second time. To third reading.
(June 21 amended measure version corrected August 9.)
(June 21 amended measure version corrected August 20.)
Read second time. Amended. To second reading.
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 3.)
(Heard in Committee on June 15.)
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
(Heard in committee on May 13.)
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on RULES.
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
(Corrected September 10.)
(Corrected August 25.)
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
(Heard in committee on July 8.)
To Com. on G.O.
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 34. Noes 0. Page 925.) To Assembly.
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
Read second time. Amended. To third reading.
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 0. Page 849.)
Set for hearing May 11.
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 0. Page 681.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on G.O.
Set for hearing April 28.
To Com. on G.O.
Read first time.
From print. May be acted upon on or after March 30.
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
| Bill Text Versions | Format |
|---|---|
| SB662 | HTML |
| 02/27/09 - Introduced | |
| 04/13/09 - Amended Senate | |
| 05/14/09 - Amended Senate | |
| 08/24/09 - Amended Assembly | |
| 01/20/10 - Amended Assembly | |
| 05/24/10 - Amended Assembly | |
| 06/21/10 - Amended Assembly | |
| 08/31/10 - Enrolled |
| Document | Format |
|---|---|
| No related documents. |
Data on Open States is updated periodically throughout the day from the official website of the California State Legislature.
If you notice any inconsistencies with these official sources, feel free to file an issue.