SB 625

  • California Senate Bill
  • 2009-2010 Regular Session
  • Introduced in Senate Feb 27, 2009
  • Passed Senate Jun 02, 2009
  • Assembly
  • Governor

Crimes: bail: release on own recognizance.

Abstract

Existing law requires a defendant who is in custody and is arraigned on a complaint alleging a misdemeanor, including a defendant arrested pursuant to an out-of-county warrant involving only misdemeanors, to be released on his or her own recognizance, unless the court makes a finding on the record that the release will compromise public safety or will not reasonably assure the appearance of the defendant as required. This bill would require a court, in deciding consistent with specified constitutional provisions whether to make one of these findings, to also consider the defendant's record of appearance at past court hearings or of flight to avoid prosecution, the maximum potential sentence that could be imposed, and the ties of the defendant to the community. Existing law provides that before any person who has been arrested for a violent felony or certain other crimes is released on bail in an amount other than that specified in the schedule of bail for the offense, or is released on his or her own recognizance, a hearing shall be held at which the court shall consider certain enumerated factors including any evidence offered by the detained person regarding his or her ties to the community and his or her ability to post bond. This bill would also require the court, in determining consistent with specified constitutional provisions whether to change the bail or release the detained person, to consider what will reasonably assure the appearance of the detained person as required. Existing law requires a court to order release of a defendant on bail pending appeal if the defendant demonstrates certain matters, including, by clear and convincing evidence, that the defendant is not likely to flee. For purposes of determining whether the defendant is not likely to flee, existing law requires the court to consider specified criteria. This bill would also require the court to consider, consistent with specified constitutional provisions, whether bail would provide reasonable assurance of the appearance of the defendant as required. Existing law requires a judge or magistrate to take specified information, including the seriousness of the offense charged, into consideration when setting, reducing, or denying bail. This bill would require the court, consistent with specified constitutional provisions, to also consider the maximum potential sentence that could be imposed and the ties of the defendant to the community. Existing law provides that a defendant charged with a violent felony shall not be released on his or her own recognizance where it appears, by clear and convincing evidence, that he or she previously has been charged with a felony offense and has willfully and without excuse from the court failed to appear in court as required while that charge was pending. In all other cases, in making a determination as to whether or not to grant release under these provisions, the court is required to consider specified information. This bill would also require the court to consider, consistent with specified constitutional provisions, whether the release would provide reasonable assurance of the appearance of the defendant as required, the defendant's record of appearance at past court hearings or of flight to avoid prosecution, the maximum potential sentence that could be imposed, and the ties of the defendant to the community. Because these provisions could result in more jail time for those awaiting trial or appeal, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.

Bill Sponsors (1)

Votes


Actions


Nov 30, 2010

Assembly

From Assembly without further action.

Assembly

From committee without further action.

Jun 30, 2009

Assembly

Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

Jun 15, 2009

Assembly

To Com. on PUB. S.

Jun 02, 2009

Senate

Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 1148.) To Assembly.

Assembly

In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

May 28, 2009

Senate

To Special Consent Calendar.

Senate

Read second time. To third reading.

May 27, 2009

Senate

From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.

May 19, 2009

Senate

Set for hearing May 26.

May 18, 2009

Senate

From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  • Reading-1
  • Referral-Committee
  • Reading-2
  • Committee-Passage
Com. on APPR.

May 14, 2009

Senate

Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

May 08, 2009

Senate

Set for hearing May 18.

May 05, 2009

Senate

Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  • Referral-Committee
  • Reading-2
  • Reading-1
Com. on APPR.

May 04, 2009

Senate

From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 706.)

Apr 13, 2009

Senate

Set for hearing April 28.

Apr 08, 2009

Senate

Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

Mar 26, 2009

Senate

Set for hearing April 14.

Mar 19, 2009

Senate

To Com. on PUB. S.

Mar 02, 2009

Senate

Read first time.

Feb 28, 2009

Senate

From print. May be acted upon on or after March 30.

Feb 27, 2009

Senate

Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Bill Text

Bill Text Versions Format
SB625 HTML
02/27/09 - Introduced PDF
05/05/09 - Amended Senate PDF
05/18/09 - Amended Senate PDF

Related Documents

Document Format
No related documents.

Sources

Data on Open States is updated periodically throughout the day from the official website of the California State Legislature.

If you notice any inconsistencies with these official sources, feel free to file an issue.