Christine Kehoe
- Democratic
Author
Existing law authorizes various agencies to acquire land for purposes related to conservation. Existing law provides for a conservation easement to retain land predominantly in its natural, scenic, historical, agricultural, forested, or open-space condition. Existing law establishes procedures for the independent appraisal review of land to be acquired for conservation and establishes a conservation easement registry. Existing law prohibits, with a specified exception, the sale of conservation lands to another owner or the transfer of possession and control of conservation lands to another agency, unless specified actions occur. The California Constitution permits private property to be taken or damaged for public use only when just compensation is paid. The Eminent Domain Law prescribes how that constitutionally authorized power may be exercised and permits that exercise only for a public use. Existing law prohibits a public entity from commencing an eminent domain proceeding until its governing body has adopted a resolution of necessity that meets specified requirements. This bill would revise the Eminent Domain Law to establish requirements for acquisition of property subject to a conservation easement. The bill would require the person seeking to acquire the property to give the holder of the conservation easement a notice containing specified information and an opportunity to comment on the acquisition. The bill would require the holder of the conservation easement to provide notice, under certain circumstances and as specified, of the proposed acquisition to each public entity that helped fund the purchase of the conservation easement or that imposed conditions on approval or permitting of a project that were satisfied, in whole or in part, by the conservation easement, and other information, as specified. The bill would require a person seeking to acquire the property subject to the conservation easement to respond to any comments in writing and provide by first-class mail the response to each easement holder or public entity that filed comments. The bill would require the notice of the hearing on the resolution of necessity to be sent to any holder of the conservation easement and public entity, as specified, and to contain information regarding the effect of failing to file a written request to appear and be heard. The bill would require that a resolution of necessity to acquire property subject to the conservation easement refer to specific authority for the acquisition of the property. The bill would specify that the holder of the conservation easement is entitled to compensation under the Eminent Domain Law, as specified. To the extent that this bill would impose new duties on a local governmental entity, this bill would create a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Stricken from Senate file.
In Senate. To unfinished business. (Veto)
Vetoed by Governor.
Enrolled. To Governor at 1 p.m.
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 27. Noes 11. Page 2389.) To enrollment.
In Senate.
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 50. Noes 25. Page 3113.) To Senate.
Read third time. Amended. To third reading.
Read second time. To third reading.
(Heard in committee on August 19.)
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 4.)
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 3.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
(Heard in committee on June 30.)
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
To Com. on JUD.
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 22. Noes 14. Page 1135.) To Assembly.
Read second time. To third reading.
Read third time. Amended. To second reading.
Read second time. To third reading.
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
Set for hearing May 18.
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 3. Noes 2. Page 586.)
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
Set for hearing April 21.
To Com. on JUD.
Read first time.
From print. May be acted upon on or after March 30.
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
| Bill Text Versions | Format |
|---|---|
| SB555 | HTML |
| 02/27/09 - Introduced | |
| 04/13/09 - Amended Senate | |
| 04/28/09 - Amended Senate | |
| 05/12/09 - Amended Senate | |
| 05/21/09 - Amended Senate | |
| 06/24/09 - Amended Assembly | |
| 07/13/09 - Amended Assembly | |
| 08/17/09 - Amended Assembly | |
| 09/03/09 - Amended Assembly | |
| 09/15/09 - Enrolled |
| Document | Format |
|---|---|
| No related documents. |
Data on Open States is updated periodically throughout the day from the official website of the California State Legislature.
If you notice any inconsistencies with these official sources, feel free to file an issue.