SB 308

  • California Senate Bill
  • 2009-2010 Regular Session
  • Introduced in Senate Feb 25, 2009
  • Passed Senate Apr 23, 2009
  • Passed Assembly Aug 17, 2009
  • Governor

Professional fiduciaries: donative transfers.

Abstract

(1) Existing law, the Professional Fiduciaries Act, defines professional fiduciaries required to be licensed by the Professional Fiduciaries Bureau within the Department of Consumer Affairs as a person who acts as a conservator or guardian for 2 or more persons who are related to the professional fiduciary or each other, or a person who acts as a trustee or agent under a durable power of attorney for more than 3 people or families who are not related to the professional fiduciary. This bill would specify how individuals are counted to determine whether a person is a professional fiduciary, including that individuals related to the fiduciary would not be counted and individuals or trustors who are related to each other would be counted as one individual. (2) Existing law, effective January 1, 2010, in relation to wills, trusts, and other instruments, defines and regulates no contest clauses. Existing law limits the application of a no contest clause to specific contests and provides that a no contest clause may be enforced against a direct contest only when it is brought without probable cause. Former law exempted certain contests from the enforcement of the no contest clause under specified circumstances, including if there was reasonable cause to believe that instrument had been revoked. Former law also permitted a beneficiary to apply to a court for a determination of whether a particular motion, petition, or other act by the beneficiary would be a contest within the terms of a no contest clause. This bill would make conforming changes to clarify under what circumstances the former law would apply. (3) Existing law provides for a decedent's property to be distributed through intestate succession when the decedent dies without a will, trust, or other instrument based on the degree of kinship. Existing law prohibits certain property transactions between certain court officials or employees or their relatives and guardians or conservators based on the lineal or collateral consanguinity of the person to the court official or employee. Existing law requires a guardian or conservator, when engaging in certain property transactions, or when seeking approval for certain acts, with the guardians or conservator's family members, based on lineal or collateral consanguinity, to disclose that relationship to the court upon a petition for approval. This bill would define the degree of kinship or consanguinity for the purpose of these provisions.

Bill Sponsors (1)

Votes


Actions


Oct 11, 2009

California State Legislature

Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 348, Statutes of 2009.

California State Legislature

Approved by Governor.

Sep 10, 2009

California State Legislature

Enrolled. To Governor at 11 a.m.

Sep 08, 2009

Senate

Ordered held in Engrossing and Enrolling.

Senate

Returned by the Governor at the request of the Senate.

Aug 27, 2009

California State Legislature

Enrolled. To Governor at 10 a.m.

Aug 24, 2009

Senate

Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 1924.) To enrollment.

Aug 20, 2009

Senate

To Special Consent Calendar.

Aug 17, 2009

Assembly

Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 76. Noes 0. Page 2617.) To Senate.

Senate

In Senate. To unfinished business.

Jul 16, 2009

Assembly

Read second time. To Consent Calendar.

Jul 15, 2009

Assembly

(Heard in committee on July 15.)

Assembly

From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.)

Jun 30, 2009

Assembly

From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  • Referral-Committee
  • Committee-Passage-Favorable
  • Committee-Passage
Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

Assembly

(Heard in committee on June 30.)

Jun 23, 2009

Assembly

(Heard in committee on June 23.)

Assembly

From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on B. & P. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on B. & P.

  • Referral-Committee
  • Committee-Passage-Favorable
  • Committee-Passage
Com. on B. & P. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on B. & P.

Jun 15, 2009

Assembly

From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

  • Reading-1
  • Referral-Committee
  • Reading-2
  • Committee-Passage
Com. on JUD.

May 21, 2009

Assembly

To Coms. on JUD. and B. & P.

Apr 23, 2009

Senate

Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 623.) To Assembly.

Assembly

In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

Apr 22, 2009

Senate

To Special Consent Calendar.

Apr 21, 2009

Senate

Read second time. To third reading.

Apr 20, 2009

Senate

From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.

Apr 14, 2009

Senate

Set for hearing April 20.

Mar 31, 2009

Senate

From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 383.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  • Referral-Committee
  • Committee-Passage-Favorable
  • Committee-Passage
Com. on APPR with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 383.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

Mar 17, 2009

Senate

Set for hearing March 31.

Mar 09, 2009

Senate

To Com. on JUD.

Feb 26, 2009

Senate

From print. May be acted upon on or after March 28.

Feb 25, 2009

Senate

Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Bill Text

Bill Text Versions Format
SB308 HTML
02/25/09 - Introduced PDF
06/15/09 - Amended Assembly PDF
08/25/09 - Enrolled PDF
10/11/09 - Chaptered PDF

Related Documents

Document Format
No related documents.

Sources

Data on Open States is updated periodically throughout the day from the official website of the California State Legislature.

If you notice any inconsistencies with these official sources, feel free to file an issue.