SB 1362

  • California Senate Bill
  • 2009-2010 Regular Session
  • Introduced in Senate Feb 19, 2010
  • Passed Senate Jun 01, 2010
  • Assembly
  • Governor

Vehicles: automated traffic enforcement systems.

Abstract

(1) Existing law authorizes the limit line, intersection, or other places where a driver is required to stop to be equipped with an automated enforcement system, as defined, if the system meets certain requirements. Existing law authorizes a governmental agency to contract out the operation of the system under certain circumstances, except for specified activities, that include, among other things, establishing guidelines for selection of location. A violation of the Vehicle Code is a crime. This bill would require that, no later than January 1, 2012, those requirements include identifying the system by signs posted within 200 feet of an intersection where a system is operating. The bill would require the governmental agency to adopt a finding of fact establishing the need for the system at a specific location for reasons related to safety for those systems installed after January 1, 2011. The bill would require, if an employee, agent, or representative of the governmental agency or of a law enforcement agency contacts the registered owner of a vehicle prior to issuing a notice to appear in an effort to determine the identity of the driver, the registered ownerto be made aware, in a clear and prominent fashion, that the registered owner is not required to provide that information and that failure to provide that information will not result in additional responsibility or liability associated with the alleged violation. The bill would prohibit a governmental agency that proposes to install or an automated traffic enforcement system from considering revenue generation, beyond recovering its actual costs of operating the system, as a factor when considering whether or not to install or operate a system within its local jurisdiction. The bill would require the manufacturer or supplier that operates an automated traffic enforcement system, in cooperation with the governmental agency, to submit an annual report to the Judicial Council that includes specified information. (2) Existing law provides special written, mailed notice to appear procedures in connection with certain alleged violations recorded by an automated traffic enforcement system and provides that whenever a written notice to appear has been issued by a peace officer or by a qualified employee of a law enforcement agency on a form approved by the Judicial Council for an alleged traffic violation recorded by an automated traffic enforcement system, and delivered by mail within 15 days of the alleged violation to the current address of the registered owner of the vehicle on file with the Department of Motor Vehicles, with a certificate of mailing obtained as evidence of service, an exact and legible duplicate copy of the notice when filed with the magistrate constitutes a complaint to which the defendant may enter a plea. This bill would expand the information that must be included on a notice to appear. The bill would authorize the mailing of a specified courtesy notice or any other notice other than a notice to appear by the issuing agency to the registered owner or the alleged violator prior to issuing a notice to appear that is required to contain specified information. The bill would prohibit a manufacturer or supplier of an automated traffic enforcement system or the governmental agency operating the system from altering the notice to appear or any other form approved by the Judicial Council. If a form is found to have been materially altered, the bill would authorize that the citation, based on the altered form, be dismissed. The bill would also require that the citation be dismissed if a magistrate or judge makes a finding that there are grounds for dismissal, in certain circumstances. (3) Because it is unlawful and constitutes an infraction for any person to violate, or fail to comply with any provision of the Vehicle Code, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (4) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Bill Sponsors (4)

Votes


Actions


Nov 30, 2010

Assembly

From Assembly without further action.

Assembly

From committee without further action.

Aug 13, 2010

Assembly

Set, second hearing. Held in committee and under submission.

Aug 05, 2010

Assembly

Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  • Referral-Committee
APPR. suspense file. APPR

Aug 02, 2010

Assembly

From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  • Reading-1
  • Referral-Committee
  • Reading-2
  • Committee-Passage
Com. on APPR.

Jun 30, 2010

Assembly

Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  • Referral-Committee
  • Reading-2
  • Reading-1
Com. on APPR.

Jun 29, 2010

Assembly

(Heard in committee on June 28.)

Assembly

From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 1.)

Jun 21, 2010

Assembly

Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

Jun 10, 2010

Assembly

To Com. on TRANS.

Jun 01, 2010

Senate

Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 31. Noes 1. Page 3695.) To Assembly.

Assembly

In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

May 25, 2010

Senate

Read second time. Amended. To third reading.

May 24, 2010

Senate

From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and be amended.

May 14, 2010

Senate

Set for hearing May 24.

May 12, 2010

Senate

Re-referred to Com. on APPR. pursuant to Joint Rule 10.5.

  • Referral-Committee
Com. on APPR. pursuant to Joint Rule 10.5.

May 11, 2010

Senate

Read second time. Amended. To third reading.

May 10, 2010

Senate

From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 3446.)

Apr 20, 2010

Senate

Set for hearing May 4.

Mar 25, 2010

Senate

Re-referred to Com. on T. & H.

  • Referral-Committee
Com. on T. & H.

Mar 23, 2010

Senate

From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.

  • Reading-1
  • Referral-Committee
  • Reading-2
  • Committee-Passage
Com. on RLS.

Mar 04, 2010

Senate

To Com. on RLS.

Feb 21, 2010

Senate

From print. May be acted upon on or after March 23.

Feb 19, 2010

Senate

Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Bill Text

Bill Text Versions Format
SB1362 HTML
02/19/10 - Introduced PDF
03/23/10 - Amended Senate PDF
05/11/10 - Amended Senate PDF
05/25/10 - Amended Senate PDF
06/30/10 - Amended Assembly PDF
08/02/10 - Amended Assembly PDF

Related Documents

Document Format
No related documents.

Sources

Data on Open States is updated periodically throughout the day from the official website of the California State Legislature.

If you notice any inconsistencies with these official sources, feel free to file an issue.