Jenny Oropeza
- Democratic
Author
Existing law governs contracts between rental car companies and their customers. Existing law authorizes a company that rents passenger vehicles to the public to collect a customer facility charge, which means a fee that is required by an airport to be collected for certain purposes, if specified circumstances apply, including, but not limited to, the collection of the fee is required by an airport operated by a city, a county, a city and county, a joint powers district, or a special district, the fee is calculated on a per contract basis, the fee is a user fee and not a tax, as specified, and the fee is $10 per contract, except as specified. This bill would expand the definition of customer facility charge to include a fee that is required by an airport to be collected for the purpose of financing, designing, constructing, and operating any common-use transportation system, as specified, and for acquiring vehicles for use in that system. This bill would also authorize an alternative fee following a hearing and finding by the airport, as provided, that the customer facility charge will not generate sufficient revenue to finance and operate the consolidated rental car facility and common-use transportation system. The bill would provide for the collection of the alternative fee on a per-day basis, as specified. Existing law provides that a statute that imposes a requirement that a state agency submit a periodic report to the Legislature is inoperative on a date 4 years after the date the first report is due. The bill would, notwithstanding that requirement, also require any airport seeking to collect an alternative customer facility charge to provide reports on an annual basis to the Senate and Assembly Committees on Judiciary detailing the total amount of the customer facility charge collected, how the funds are being spent, the amount of and reason for any changes in the airport's budget or financial needs, and whether certain airport concession fees have increased since the prior report, if any. The bill would also require the airport to complete a specified independent audit prior to the initial collection of the customer facility charge, prior to any increase, as specified, and every 3 years after initial collection and any increase, as provided. The bill would require the Controller to review those audits and independently examine and substantiate the necessity for and the amount of the customer facility charge. The bill would require the individual airports being audited to reimburse the Controller's costs. The bill would also require the Controller to report to the Legislature on his or her conclusions, as provided. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 1936 of the Civil Code, as proposed by AB 2059, to be operative only if AB 2059 and this bill are both enacted, each bill amends Section 1936 of the Civil Code, and this bill is enacted after AB 2059.
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 642, Statutes of 2010.
Approved by Governor.
Enrolled. To Governor at 3:30 p.m.
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 21. Noes 15. Page 5083.) To enrollment.
Read second time. To third reading.
In Senate. To unfinished business.
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 49. Noes 27. Page 6874.) To Senate.
Read third time. Amended. (Page 6850.)
Read second time. Amended. To second reading.
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 6. Noes 1.)
(Heard in committee on August 25.)
Joint Rule 62(a) file notice suspended. (Page 6608.)
Re-referred to Com. On JUD. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
Assembly Rule 69(d) suspended. (Ayes 49. Noes 27. Page 6491.)
(August amended measure version corrected August 26.)
Read third time. Amended. (Page 6427.) To third reading.
Read second time. To third reading.
Read second time. Amended. To second reading.
(Heard in committee on August 4.)
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.)
Joint Rule 62(a) file notice suspended. (Page 5989.)
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 2.)
(Heard in committee on June 29.)
Hearing postponed by committee.
Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
To Com. on JUD.
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 32. Noes 1. Page 3789.) To Assembly.
Read second time. Amended. To third reading.
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 2. Page 3673.)
(Suspense - for vote only).
Set for hearing May 27.
Placed on APPR suspense file.
Set for hearing May 24.
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 3445.)
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on L. GOV. (Ayes 4. Noes 0. Page 3444.) Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
Set for hearing May 5 in L. GOV. pending receipt.
Set for hearing May 4.
Hearing postponed by committee.
Set for hearing April 27.
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
To Com. on RLS.
From print. May be acted upon on or after March 21.
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
| Bill Text Versions | Format |
|---|---|
| SB1192 | HTML |
| 02/18/10 - Introduced | |
| 03/22/10 - Amended Senate | |
| 05/11/10 - Amended Senate | |
| 06/02/10 - Amended Senate | |
| 08/02/10 - Amended Assembly | |
| 08/09/10 - Amended Assembly | |
| 08/20/10 - Amended Assembly | |
| 08/27/10 - Amended Assembly | |
| 08/30/10 - Amended Assembly | |
| 09/02/10 - Enrolled | |
| 09/30/10 - Chaptered |
| Document | Format |
|---|---|
| No related documents. |
Data on Open States is updated periodically throughout the day from the official website of the California State Legislature.
If you notice any inconsistencies with these official sources, feel free to file an issue.