AB 2394

  • California Assembly Bill
  • 2009-2010 Regular Session
  • Introduced in Assembly Feb 19, 2010
  • Passed Assembly May 20, 2010
  • Passed Senate Aug 18, 2010
  • Signed by Governor Sep 30, 2010

Civil process and notices: ministerial officers.

Abstract

(1) Existing law provides for the service of process and notices, including a writ or summons issued in the course of judicial proceedings, by the sheriff or other ministerial officer. Certain documents and records relating to the service of process and notices, including any direction or authority by a party or his or her attorney to a sheriff in respect to the execution or return of process and instructions from a judgment creditor to a levying officer, are required to be in writing, as specified. This bill would generally authorize a levying officer, as defined, to electronically transmit and receive specified documents and records relating to enforcement of judgments. The bill would require specified information to be included with the electronic transmission, and would require a levying officer to exclude or redact certain identifiers from any document or record made available to the public. The bill would provide additional safeguards and procedures relating to the electronic transmission of documents and records, and make other conforming changes. (2) Existing law requires a writ of execution, possession, or sale, and written instructions from a judgment creditor to a levying officer relating to the enforcement of a judgment, to include specified information. This bill would require those process documents to specify certain additional information, including the type of legal entity of the judgment debtor, if other than a natural person. The bill also would require a writ of execution, possession, or sale to include a statement indicating whether the case is limited or unlimited. (3) Existing law specifies procedures for issuance and return of postjudgment writs of execution. Among other things, the levying officer is required to return the writ to the court, together with a report of his or her actions and an accounting of amounts collected and costs incurred, within specified time periods. This bill would authorize the levying officer to retain the original writ or an electronic copy and to electronically file with the court a return of his or her actions, and an accounting of amounts collected and costs incurred, in lieu of returning the paper version of an original writ of execution. The return of the levying officer's actions and the accounting would be required to be filed with the court, and the writ would expire, within those specified time periods. The bill would make other conforming changes. (4) Existing law requires an earnings withholding order to be served by personal delivery or by registered or certified mail. This bill, instead, would require an earnings withholding order to be served by personal delivery or by first-class mail, as specified. (5) The Documentary Transfer Tax Act authorizes the board of supervisors of a county or city and county to impose a tax upon specified instruments that transfer specified interests in real property. Existing law requires the levying officer conducting the sale of real property that has been levied upon, when the purchaser pays the amount due, to execute and deliver a deed of sale to the purchaser and record a duplicate of the deed of sale in the office of the county recorder. This bill would clarify that the purchaser of levied upon real property is responsible for paying the documentary transfer tax. (6) Existing law establishes procedures, as specified, as an alternative to issuing a warrant for contempt, pursuant to which a court may issue an arrest warrant for a witness who failed to appear pursuant to a subpoena or a person who failed to appear pursuant to a court order. Existing law specifies the contents of the arrest warrant, including the signature of the magistrate issuing the warrant. This bill, instead, would require the arrest warrant to include the signature or name of the judicial officer issuing the warrant. (7) By increasing the duties of local ministerial officers relating to the service of process and notice, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.

Bill Sponsors (1)

Votes


Actions


Sep 30, 2010

California State Legislature

Approved by the Governor.

California State Legislature

Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 680, Statutes of 2010.

Aug 26, 2010

California State Legislature

Enrolled and to the Governor at 4:45 p.m.

Aug 19, 2010

Assembly

Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 6398.)

Assembly

Assembly Rule 77 suspended. (Page 6373.)

Aug 18, 2010

Senate

Read third time, passed, and to Assembly. (Ayes 34. Noes 0. Page 4603.)

Assembly

In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 20 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.

Aug 12, 2010

Senate

Ordered to Special Consent Calendar.

Aug 04, 2010

Senate

Read second time. To third reading.

Aug 03, 2010

Senate

From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (August 2).

Jun 23, 2010

Senate

From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. Re-referred. (Ayes 4. Noes 0.) (June 22).

Jun 14, 2010

Senate

From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on JUD.

  • Amendment-Introduction
  • Reading-2
  • Amendment-Passage
  • Referral-Committee
  • Reading-1
Com. on JUD.

Jun 03, 2010

Senate

Referred to Com. on JUD.

  • Referral-Committee
Com. on JUD.

May 20, 2010

Senate

In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

Assembly

Read third time, passed, and to Senate. (Ayes 72. Noes 0. Page 5235.)

May 17, 2010

Assembly

Read second time. To Consent Calendar.

May 13, 2010

Assembly

From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (May 12).

Apr 29, 2010

Assembly

Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  • Referral-Committee
Com. on APPR.

Apr 28, 2010

Assembly

Read second time and amended.

Assembly

(Corrected May 10.)

Apr 27, 2010

Assembly

From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (April 20).

Apr 06, 2010

Assembly

In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

Mar 23, 2010

Assembly

In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

Mar 11, 2010

Assembly

Referred to Com. on JUD.

  • Referral-Committee
Com. on JUD.

Feb 22, 2010

Assembly

Read first time.

Feb 21, 2010

Assembly

From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.

Feb 19, 2010

Assembly

Introduced. To print.

Bill Text

Bill Text Versions Format
AB2394 HTML
02/19/10 - Introduced PDF
04/28/10 - Amended Assembly PDF
06/14/10 - Amended Senate PDF
08/24/10 - Enrolled PDF
09/30/10 - Chaptered PDF

Related Documents

Document Format
No related documents.

Sources

Data on Open States is updated periodically throughout the day from the official website of the California State Legislature.

If you notice any inconsistencies with these official sources, feel free to file an issue.