AB 1163

  • California Assembly Bill
  • 2009-2010 Regular Session
  • Introduced in Assembly Feb 27, 2009
  • Passed Assembly Apr 27, 2009
  • Passed Senate Jun 15, 2009
  • Signed by Governor Jun 29, 2009

Attorney-client privilege: decedent's estates.

Abstract

(1) Under existing law, a client of a lawyer has a privilege to refuse to disclose, and to prevent another from disclosing, a confidential communication between the client and lawyer if the privilege is claimed by the holder of the privilege, a person who is authorized to claim the privilege by the holder, or the person who was the lawyer at the time of the confidential communication. However, the lawyer may not claim the privilege if there is no holder of the privilege in existence or if he or she is otherwise instructed by a person authorized to permit disclosure. "Holder of the privilege" is defined for purposes of these provisions to include the client, a guardian or conservator of the client, the personal representative of the client if the client is dead, and a successor, assign, trustee in dissolution, or any similar representative of a firm, association, organization, partnership, business trust, corporation, or public entity that is no longer in existence. This bill would clarify that the personal representative of a client that is dead, and who is appointed for purposes of subsequent estate administration pursuant to the provisions described in (3) below, is a holder of the privilege. (2) Under existing law, there is no lawyer-client privilege as to a communication relevant to an issue between parties all of whom claim through a deceased client, regardless of whether the claims are by testate or intestate succession or by inter vivos transaction. This bill would clarify that this exception also applies when any of the parties claims under a nonprobate transfer. (3) Under existing law, if subsequent administration of an estate is necessary after the personal representative has been discharged either because other property is discovered, or disclosure is sought of a communication that is deemed privileged in the absence of a waiver by a personal representative, as specified, or because it becomes necessary or proper for any other cause, the court is required to appoint as personal representative the person entitled to appointment and to give notice of the hearing of the appointment to the person who served as personal representative at the time of the order of discharge and to other interested persons, as specified. Existing law requires the appointed personal representative to be a holder of the decedent's lawyer-client privilege, as specified. This bill would delete the requirement that the appointed personal representative be a holder of the decedent's lawyer-client privilege. The bill also would delete the requirement that the court perform these functions when subsequent administration of an estate is necessary after the personal representative has been discharged because disclosure is sought of a communication that is deemed privileged in the absence of a waiver by a personal representative.

Bill Sponsors (1)

Votes


Actions


Jun 29, 2009

California State Legislature

Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 8, Statutes of 2009.

California State Legislature

Approved by the Governor.

Jun 18, 2009

California State Legislature

Enrolled and to the Governor at 10:30 a.m.

Jun 15, 2009

Assembly

In Assembly. To enrollment.

Senate

Read third time, passed, and to Assembly. (Ayes 36. Noes 0. Page 1297.)

Jun 10, 2009

Senate

Read second time. To Consent Calendar.

Jun 09, 2009

Senate

From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (June 9).

May 14, 2009

Senate

Referred to Com. on JUD.

  • Referral-Committee
Com. on JUD.

Apr 27, 2009

Assembly

Read third time, passed, and to Senate. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 1109.)

Senate

In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

Apr 22, 2009

Assembly

Read second time. To Consent Calendar.

Apr 21, 2009

Assembly

From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (April 21).

Apr 02, 2009

Assembly

In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

Mar 27, 2009

Assembly

Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

  • Referral-Committee
Com. on JUD.

Mar 26, 2009

Assembly

From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Read second time and amended.

Assembly

Referred to Com. on JUD.

  • Referral-Committee
Com. on JUD.

Mar 02, 2009

Assembly

Read first time.

Mar 01, 2009

Assembly

From printer. May be heard in committee March 30.

Feb 27, 2009

Assembly

Introduced. To print.

Bill Text

Bill Text Versions Format
AB1163 HTML
02/27/09 - Introduced PDF
03/26/09 - Amended Assembly PDF
06/16/09 - Enrolled PDF
06/29/09 - Chaptered PDF

Related Documents

Document Format
No related documents.

Sources

Data on Open States is updated periodically throughout the day from the official website of the California State Legislature.

If you notice any inconsistencies with these official sources, feel free to file an issue.